mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Carlos Corbacho <cathectic@slackadelic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mikko Tiihonen <mikko.tiihonen@iki.fi>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: nVidia HPET force enable - merge requirements? (resend)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:50:08 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710190847500.22770@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710190423.31714.cathectic@slackadelic.com>

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> Back in April, Mikko posted a patch to force enable the HPET on some nVidia 
> chipsets:
>
> A) There is now a force_hpet boot parameter in the x86 tree (mm branch) 
> (rather than relying on the solution in the earlier patches of a config 
> option).

There is still a config option for hpet. the hpet=force boot param is
there to allow force enable hpet for not documented chip set features.
 
> B) On the other hand, the force-quirk's are going into quirks.c, whilst 
> Mikko's patch requires PCI scanning in early_quirks.c (could the PCI scanning 
> be done in early_quirks.c and the actual HPET enabling handled in quirks.c 
> later - or if not, could this early quirk play be made to obey the force_hpet 
> boot option)?

It's not necessary to scan in early_quirks.c at all. The force hpet
code handles the late DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER() based detection just
fine.

So if there are working quirks, please refactor them analogous to the
existing ones in quirks.c.

All undocumented chipset poking needs to be protected by the
hpet=force boot option, so the default is not to do scan for it.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-19  3:23 Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19  6:50 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-10-19 15:29   ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 16:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 17:51       ` [PATCH] x86: Force enable HPET for CK804 (nForce 4) chipsets Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 17:58         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 18:07           ` [PATCH] x86: Fix resume for nVidia and force_hpet Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 18:15             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 18:34               ` x86: Add HPET force support for MCP55 (nForce 5) chipsets Carlos Corbacho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710190847500.22770@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cathectic@slackadelic.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikko.tiihonen@iki.fi \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®