From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Carlos Corbacho <cathectic@slackadelic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mikko Tiihonen <mikko.tiihonen@iki.fi>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: nVidia HPET force enable - merge requirements? (resend)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:19:37 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710191736280.22770@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710191629.11526.cathectic@slackadelic.com>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> Would the following patch be more acceptable then? I've limited the device
> id's to just the nForce 4 chipset, because that's the only one I have here
> to test with at the moment - it appears to work fine:
Yes, looks good. It is just missing the resume part, which is
necessary to reenable the hpet after suspend/resume.
> hpet clockevent registered
> hpet0: at MMIO 0xfefff000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
> hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
> Time: hpet clocksource has been installed.
> Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0
> Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 1
>
> At the moment, I'm not clear on how to detect if the HPET has not been
> enabled by the BIOS (but given that this is hidden behind hpet=force,
> would this be acceptable, since the user would have to explicitly call
> hpet=force, and then it either works or doesn't?)
Don't worry. If HPET is enabled in the BIOS, then we have an
hpet_address already before we come into the force enable
quirk. That's why we check for hpet_address in the quirk code.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-19 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 3:23 Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 6:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 15:29 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 16:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-10-19 17:51 ` [PATCH] x86: Force enable HPET for CK804 (nForce 4) chipsets Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 17:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 18:07 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix resume for nVidia and force_hpet Carlos Corbacho
2007-10-19 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 18:34 ` x86: Add HPET force support for MCP55 (nForce 5) chipsets Carlos Corbacho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710191736280.22770@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=cathectic@slackadelic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikko.tiihonen@iki.fi \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®