From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:14:34 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712231703390.21557@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712231621340.21557@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> IOW, it looks like the normal kind of ACPI mess. Color me not in the least
> surprised, and it needs somebody who understands AML and what the heck is
> supposed to happen to figure out.
Side note: we could obviously undo the commit that triggered this for you
(ie 52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056fe0786c28d0555), but then we have to undo
also the commit that caused us to do that commit in the first place, and
change the ordering on resume too (that would be commit
e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - the commit that moved the
"pm_ops->finish()" call to before the call to device_resume())
In other words, we'd have to go back to our original ordering, which Len
said was fundamentally wrong. I don't think anybody really wants that.
It would be better to figure out why "device_suspend()" apparently causes
problems for your AML crud.
Oh, and why is linux-kernel cc'd, but not linux-pm? Are all the relevant
people from linux-pm cc'd, or should somebody who is on that list please
try to condense this down?
(For linux-pm: see
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528
for some more details, including a few red herrings like the whole subject
line of this email thread which turned out to not be valid after all).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-24 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200712231419.40207.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
2007-12-23 16:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-23 17:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-23 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-23 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-24 0:09 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-24 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-24 1:14 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2007-12-24 3:05 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-24 13:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-24 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-24 21:53 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 16:13 ` Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-26 15:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 15:24 ` Suspend code ordering (again) Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-12-26 17:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-25 12:12 ` x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM Pavel Machek
2007-12-25 12:28 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-23 17:53 ` [Bug 9528] " Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-23 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-23 20:43 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] <fa.Tr7qmPdet0rF2FSRX/94s2UEMSE@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.5MPS0t6OtOOALbc90ywKDrtik+4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.zg2cR0292Evub+o7LgQUdg4A7ZM@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ZBHAMdWAEaW7Flaz8/Gc8PLZUNg@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-24 22:40 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-25 0:03 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 13:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-25 13:12 ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-25 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-25 17:17 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-25 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-26 4:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-26 5:13 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-26 7:23 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712231703390.21557@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®