From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Arne Georg Gleditsch <arne.gleditsch@dolphinics.no>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c: overeager NOP of syscalls
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:08:30 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802201836480.7583@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kjm4pc3d92p.fsf@pelargir.dolphinics.no>
Arne,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Arne Georg Gleditsch wrote:
> I'm looking at 2.6.25-rc2. vsyscall_sysctl_change contains code to NOP
> out the actual system call instructions of the vsyscall page when
> vsyscall64 is enabled. This seems to interact badly with the fallback
> code in do_vgettimeofday which tries to call gettimeofday if the
> configured clock source does not support vread. (In effect,
> gettimeofday() becomes a nop and time() always returns 0. Not very
> useful.)
Indeed.
> Is there a good reason to keep this? Aren't the instructions in
> question avoided (or invoked) according to the vsyscall64 flag by the
> surrounding logic anyway?
The initial intent of this was to make it harder for malicious code to
attack via the vsysall area.
But you are right, the code is indeed fundamentally unsafe in various
aspects:
1) the patching code runs without synchronizing other CPUs
2) it inserts NOPs even if there is no clock source which provides
vread
3) when the clock source changes to one without vread we run in
exactly the same problem as in #2
The correct solution is randomizing that area, but that's definitely
not an ad hoc fix.
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm looking into fixing this ASAP.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-20 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-20 13:57 Arne Georg Gleditsch
2008-02-20 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-02-21 15:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-21 19:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-21 20:02 ` john stultz
2008-02-21 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-21 20:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-22 12:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-22 12:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-22 10:38 ` Arne Georg Gleditsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.00.0802201836480.7583@apollo.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arne.gleditsch@dolphinics.no \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®