From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LogFS merge
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:17:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805021010040.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org>
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> not being familiar with either maintaining my own git tree or the -next
> process, I'd still like to get logfs into mainline. It has gone through
> six rounds of reviews and the last has been mostly about crossing some
> i's here and dotting some t's there.
The thing I'd like to see is:
- a more recent description of file system layout
I've read the original paper, and I assume things have changed when
implementing stuff. They always do.
- some benchmarks and/or comments about regular usage (ie fragmentation
etc). Yeah, it doesn't need to be all that extensive, but quite
frankly, it sounds like this is meant to be at least a partial
replacement for a GP filesystem (considering that seek/rotational
delay are going away) and people are working on it with USB memory
sticks etc, wouldn't it make sense to talk about disk usage (how much
the GC wants free etc) and everyday performance?
Hmm?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 13:32 Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-02 21:47 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-02 20:21 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 21:31 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 21:58 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-03 7:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03 9:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 9:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03 9:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 9:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-03 11:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-03 17:59 ` Offtopic to: " David Collier-Brown
2008-05-02 17:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-02 21:34 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-05 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-03 9:29 matthieu castet
2008-05-03 12:00 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-04 16:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-04 18:04 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805021010040.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome