mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LogFS merge
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:39:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805021438180.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080502213146.GD24080@logfs.org>



On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> I have a solution for this, but it would require an incompatible change
> to the format.  And right now I have fairly good confidence in the
> format wrt. ensuring correctness.  So the plan is to merge logfs as-is
> (modulo bugfixes, review fallout, etc.) and handle the changes for this
> and other performance problems with compat flags.  And someday rename
> the whole mess to log2fs and remove some support for old format
> variants.

Quite frankly, if that's the case, I'd *much* rather see that worked on 
first, so that there aren't any format changes that are already known to 
be pending before it even gets merged.

Would it be at all possible to try to do that, or is it just "too far 
out"?

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-02 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-02 13:32 Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33     ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-05-02 21:47   ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 20:21   ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 20:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-02 21:31       ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-02 21:39         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-02 21:58           ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-03  7:03             ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03  9:11               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03  9:18                 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-03  9:37                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03  9:44                 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-03 11:06                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-03 17:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-03 17:59                 ` Offtopic to: " David Collier-Brown
2008-05-02 17:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-02 21:34   ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-05 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-03  9:29 matthieu castet
2008-05-03 12:00 ` Jörn Engel
2008-05-04 16:20   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-04 18:04     ` Josh Boyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805021438180.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®