Re: linux-next: the purge :-)

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Thu, 8 May 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Having published my expectations of what should be in linux-next, I am
> no implementing what I think is what I said.  :-)
> 
> This is open to discussion (including suggestions about other trees).
> 
> The following trees are being excluded from today because I think that
> they contain changes that:
> 	- have not been published/reviewed/tested sufficiently
> 	- are not currently intended for 2.6.26 or 2.6.27.
> (not all reasons apply to all trees).  Please don't take offense, I am
> just trying to obey my own guidelines.
> 
> ldp
> x86_latest
> sched_latest
> 
> Ingo, I assume that things will migrate from {x86,sched} latest to
> for-akpm (for-next?) over time.

We are working on refactoring our x86 work flow. We'll give you
notice, when the dust of the demolition has settled.

Thanks,
	tglx