* [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups
@ 2008-05-21 21:08 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-22 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2008-05-21 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
Hello,
This is a set of patches replacing patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer_ack-1
and patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-0 sent previously. The patches
have been split up into smaller logically self-contained chunks to make
tracking down problems easier.
The patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-nosmp-watchdog-0 change fixes a problem
with timer interrupts getting masked in the 8259A as a result of
patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-6 in the corner-case scenario of
"nmi_watchdog=1 nosmp" being passed at the command line.
As there are some interdependencies the patches are best applied in the
order I am sending them; see also the paragraph above.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups
2008-05-21 21:08 [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2008-05-22 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-22 22:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-05-22 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a set of patches replacing patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer_ack-1
> and patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-0 sent previously. The patches
> have been split up into smaller logically self-contained chunks to make
> tracking down problems easier.
>
> The patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-nosmp-watchdog-0 change fixes a problem
> with timer interrupts getting masked in the 8259A as a result of
> patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-8259-6 in the corner-case scenario of
> "nmi_watchdog=1 nosmp" being passed at the command line.
>
> As there are some interdependencies the patches are best applied in the
> order I am sending them; see also the paragraph above.
Looks really good. Applied. Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups
2008-05-22 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2008-05-22 22:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2008-05-22 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As there are some interdependencies the patches are best applied in the
> > order I am sending them; see also the paragraph above.
>
> Looks really good. Applied. Thanks,
As a follow-on I think it might be a good idea to wrap timer_ack into
get_timer_ack() and set_timer_ack() expanding as necessary so that the
related 32-bit and 64-bit code can get unified.
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-22 22:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-21 21:08 [PATCH 0/8] x86: Timer through APIC and related clean-ups Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-22 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-22 22:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®