From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] 64-bit futexes: Intro
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:23:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805302116440.3141@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805302109370.3141@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Also note how you can use 64-bit atomic ops to do that all in user space,
> without actually requiring 64-bit futex support - as long as the bits that
> matter for waking (like "was there more than one pending writer") fit in
> the one 32-bit word.
So here's an example of this:
- make all the readers/writers actually update a 64-bit word (by using
cmpxchg8b in user space to actually get the locks)
- but organize things so that a reader only needs to look at the high 32
bits to actually make it's wakeup-decision, and a sleeping writer only
needs to look at the low 32 bits. How? Make the low bits of the words
contain the "contention status".
Is it possible? I dunno. I personally suspect it is. I also suspect you
didn't even try.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-31 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-31 1:27 Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-31 2:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-31 3:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-31 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-31 4:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-31 4:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-31 4:23 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-05-31 4:38 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-05-31 4:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-31 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-31 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-02 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-02 23:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-03 3:24 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-04 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-04 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-05 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 1:58 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 3:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-05 4:29 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 1:27 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 3:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-06 11:53 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0805302116440.3141@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®