* any reason for the continued hard-coding of "BUILD_CRAMDISK"?
@ 2008-06-24 10:49 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2008-06-24 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
just curious as to whether there is still some value for the
explicit definition of the BUILD_CRAMDISK macro in
init/do_mounts_rd.c. that macro is unreferenced anywhere else in the
tree, so it seems pointless to define and test a macro within the same
source file.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-06-24 10:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-24 10:49 any reason for the continued hard-coding of "BUILD_CRAMDISK"? Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®