mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux@sandersweb.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi-suse@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 kenel won't boot under Virtual PC
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:59:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809080954370.3117@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809080925400.10413@asgard.lang.hm>



On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, david@lang.hm wrote:
> 
> I always understood the CPU selection to be "this CPU and ones compatible with
> it will work, others won't" unless generic was enabled.

No.

Read the help text.. 

Yes, we care about features that MATTER. But if compiles start using 
features that don't really matter, and make a specific kernel _too_ 
specific, then we need to reign in the madness.

IOW, it's a balance. On one hand, yes, the uarch makes sense. On the 
other, it's just stupid to have to worry about details that don't 
realistically make any difference at all - except whether the machine 
works or not.

And yes, we could just put this up as a Virtual PC bug. It clearly is. But 
in the end, it _still_ all boils down to a balance between "do we actually 
win anything by using NOPL statically" vs "do we lose anything by being 
too damn inconvenient".

		Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-08 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-31 18:22 David Sanders
2008-08-31 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-31 19:27   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-31 19:39     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-05 15:38       ` David Sanders
2008-09-05 16:15         ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-05 16:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-05 18:43             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 20:06               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-05 19:08             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-05 20:12           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-05 16:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-05 17:55           ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-31 20:03   ` David Sanders
2008-09-01 20:23     ` David Sanders
2008-09-01 22:22       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 12:08         ` David Sanders
2008-09-02 18:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 18:44             ` David Sanders
2008-09-03 11:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-03 11:20                 ` David Sanders
     [not found] ` <48C1C156.9080003@zytor.com>
2008-09-07 20:07   ` David Sanders
2008-09-07 23:22     ` David Sanders
2008-09-08  1:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08  2:49         ` David Sanders
2008-09-08  4:04           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08  9:42             ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 13:25             ` David Sanders
2008-09-08 15:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 15:23               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 15:36                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 15:38                 ` David Sanders
2008-09-08 15:38                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 15:45               ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 15:43                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 15:50                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 15:50                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 15:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 15:57                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 15:54                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 16:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 16:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 16:15                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 16:26                         ` David Sanders
2008-09-08 16:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 16:32                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 17:02                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 16:34                         ` david
2008-09-08 16:42                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 18:51                             ` david
2008-09-08 16:59                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-09-08 17:00                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08 17:04                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 17:08                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 17:12                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 17:41                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 17:38                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 17:59                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 19:09                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-08 22:42                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-08 17:18                             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0809080954370.3117@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi-suse@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@sandersweb.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome