From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: do_boot_cpu - check if we have ESR register
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:52:40 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0810221643250.24509@ftp.linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022142312.GC26372@elte.hu>
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ah, Compaq - how many CPUs does that box support? If it's 8 or more then
> perhaps they turned off the real local APIC, fudged some chipset glue to
> emulate APIC functionality and thus were able to use 8 or more of these
> chips? The built-in lapic would only go up to 4 CPUs. (or maybe even
> just up to dual, depending on the model)
Hmm, interesting. The integrated APIC should support up to 14 CPUs
(assuming one ID is needed for the I/O APIC). One cannot preclude silicon
errata affecting the less common hardware configurations though. It would
be interesting to see a full bootstrap log with all the APIC debug
information enabled. That would probably clarify matters a bit.
Note that Compaq would have to come with their own solution about the
discrete APIC as the 82489DX went out of production many years ago -- ten
at the very least. OTOH, they could have stockpiled them back then. ;)
This is one of the few manufacturers I would actually suspect doing so as
they always seemed keen on going SMP. Good to know we can support these
boxes at all these days.
> This reminds us that all the is-integrated-lapic checks still matter
> today.
Quite surprising indeed.
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 14:00 Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-22 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 14:17 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-22 15:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-22 14:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-22 14:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 14:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-22 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 15:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-22 15:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 15:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-22 15:18 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-22 15:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2008-10-22 15:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-22 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0810221643250.24509@ftp.linux-mips.org \
--to=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®