From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux ACPI list <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ACPI: cpufreq: Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance proc entries
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:13:31 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902040012551.5607@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233679606-1971-8-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>
applied
thanks,
--
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> They were long enough set deprecated...
>
> Update Documentation/cpu-freq/users-guide.txt:
> The deprecated files listed there seen not to exist for some time anymore
> already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> CC: Linux ACPI list <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt | 16 -----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig | 11 ----
> drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 105 ---------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
> index 57f23cb..75f4119 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/user-guide.txt
> @@ -207,19 +207,3 @@ scaling_setspeed. By "echoing" a new frequency into this
> you can change the speed of the CPU,
> but only within the limits of
> scaling_min_freq and scaling_max_freq.
> -
> -
> -3.2 Deprecated Interfaces
> --------------------------
> -
> -Depending on your kernel configuration, you might find the following
> -cpufreq-related files:
> -/proc/cpufreq
> -/proc/sys/cpu/*/speed
> -/proc/sys/cpu/*/speed-min
> -/proc/sys/cpu/*/speed-max
> -
> -These are files for deprecated interfaces to cpufreq, which offer far
> -less functionality. Because of this, these interfaces aren't described
> -here.
> -
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
> index b63b0db..52c8398 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
> @@ -230,17 +230,6 @@ config X86_E_POWERSAVER
>
> comment "shared options"
>
> -config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF
> - bool "/proc/acpi/processor/../performance interface (deprecated)"
> - depends on PROC_FS
> - depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K7_ACPI || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
> - help
> - This enables the deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance
> - interface. While it is helpful for debugging, the generic,
> - cross-architecture cpufreq interfaces should be used.
> -
> - If in doubt, say N.
> -
> config X86_SPEEDSTEP_LIB
> tristate
> default (X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH || X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI || X86_P4_CLOCKMOD)
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> index 846e227..9cc769b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> @@ -31,14 +31,6 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF
> -#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> -#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> -#include <linux/mutex.h>
> -
> -#include <asm/uaccess.h>
> -#endif
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #endif
> @@ -434,96 +426,6 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_notify_smm);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF
> -/* /proc/acpi/processor/../performance interface (DEPRECATED) */
> -
> -static int acpi_processor_perf_open_fs(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
> -static struct file_operations acpi_processor_perf_fops = {
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .open = acpi_processor_perf_open_fs,
> - .read = seq_read,
> - .llseek = seq_lseek,
> - .release = single_release,
> -};
> -
> -static int acpi_processor_perf_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> -{
> - struct acpi_processor *pr = seq->private;
> - int i;
> -
> -
> - if (!pr)
> - goto end;
> -
> - if (!pr->performance) {
> - seq_puts(seq, "<not supported>\n");
> - goto end;
> - }
> -
> - seq_printf(seq, "state count: %d\n"
> - "active state: P%d\n",
> - pr->performance->state_count, pr->performance->state);
> -
> - seq_puts(seq, "states:\n");
> - for (i = 0; i < pr->performance->state_count; i++)
> - seq_printf(seq,
> - " %cP%d: %d MHz, %d mW, %d uS\n",
> - (i == pr->performance->state ? '*' : ' '), i,
> - (u32) pr->performance->states[i].core_frequency,
> - (u32) pr->performance->states[i].power,
> - (u32) pr->performance->states[i].transition_latency);
> -
> - end:
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int acpi_processor_perf_open_fs(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> -{
> - return single_open(file, acpi_processor_perf_seq_show,
> - PDE(inode)->data);
> -}
> -
> -static void acpi_cpufreq_add_file(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> - struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> -
> -
> - if (acpi_bus_get_device(pr->handle, &device))
> - return;
> -
> - /* add file 'performance' [R/W] */
> - proc_create_data(ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_PERFORMANCE, S_IFREG | S_IRUGO,
> - acpi_device_dir(device),
> - &acpi_processor_perf_fops, acpi_driver_data(device));
> - return;
> -}
> -
> -static void acpi_cpufreq_remove_file(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> - struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> -
> -
> - if (acpi_bus_get_device(pr->handle, &device))
> - return;
> -
> - /* remove file 'performance' */
> - remove_proc_entry(ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_PERFORMANCE,
> - acpi_device_dir(device));
> -
> - return;
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -static void acpi_cpufreq_add_file(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> - return;
> -}
> -static void acpi_cpufreq_remove_file(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> - return;
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF */
> -
> static int acpi_processor_get_psd(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> {
> int result = 0;
> @@ -747,14 +649,12 @@ err_ret:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_preregister_performance);
>
> -
> int
> acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
> *performance, unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct acpi_processor *pr;
>
> -
> if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -781,8 +681,6 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> - acpi_cpufreq_add_file(pr);
> -
> mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -795,7 +693,6 @@ acpi_processor_unregister_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
> {
> struct acpi_processor *pr;
>
> -
> mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
>
> pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> @@ -808,8 +705,6 @@ acpi_processor_unregister_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
> kfree(pr->performance->states);
> pr->performance = NULL;
>
> - acpi_cpufreq_remove_file(pr);
> -
> mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
>
> return;
> --
> 1.6.0.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-03 16:46 CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] CPUFREQ: Introduce /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/cpuinfo_transition_latency Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: deprecate sampling_rate{min,max} Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: sanitize sampling_rate restrictions Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:07 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Get transition latency from ACPI _PSS table Thomas Renninger
2009-02-08 18:35 ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Always compile powernow-k8 driver with ACPI support Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Only print error message once, not per core Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 9:59 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] ACPI: cpufreq: Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance proc entries Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:13 ` Len Brown [this message]
2009-02-03 16:48 ` CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Dave Jones
2009-02-03 21:21 ` Dave Jones
2009-02-03 23:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 23:44 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0902040012551.5607@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®