mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] module: wait for other modules after dropping the module_mutex
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005311316270.3637@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005311315460.3637@i5.linux-foundation.org>


From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:09:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] module: wait for other modules after dropping the module_mutex

Instead of doing a "use_module()" when linking to other modules, we do a
simpler link_module() that does not require the dependent modules to be
initialized.  We then wait for all dependent modules _after_ we have
dropped the module_mutex lock, which avoids a deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

This is the patch that should hopefully fix Brandon's deadlock. But I 
haven't really tested that case - so who knows?

 kernel/module.c |  105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 82ae1e4..c95f97e 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -611,6 +611,54 @@ int use_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
 
+/* Module a links to b */
+static int link_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
+{
+	if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b))
+		return 1;
+	if (!try_module_get(b))
+		return 0;
+	return add_module_usage(a, b);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Are all modules LIVE? Return 0 (ok) if so.
+ * Return -EINVAL if any are going, and EAGAIN
+ * if there are modules still initializing.
+ */
+static int all_modules_ok(struct module *mod)
+{
+	int err = 0;
+	struct module_use *use;
+
+	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(use, &mod->target_list, target_list) {
+		struct module *target = use->target;
+		switch (target->state) {
+		case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
+			break;
+		case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
+			if (!err)
+				err = -EAGAIN;
+			break;
+		default:
+			err = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+	return err;
+}
+
+/* Wait for dependent modules to finish */
+static int module_load_wait(struct module *mod)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(module_wq, (err = all_modules_ok(mod)) != -EAGAIN, 30 * HZ) <= 0)
+		printk("%s: gave up waiting for init of modules.\n", mod->name);
+	return err;
+}
+
 /* Clear the unload stuff of the module. */
 static void module_unload_free(struct module *mod)
 {
@@ -898,6 +946,21 @@ int use_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
 
+/* FIXME! This is wrong. We should do the full link_module. Otherwise
+ * we'll fail if a module we depend on just happens to be loading */
+static int link_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
+{
+	return strong_try_module_get(b) == 0;
+}
+
+/* Wait for dependent modules to finish. See the FIXME on link_module()
+ * above: we've required that the modules were initialized too early,
+ * so there is nothing to wait on now (nor do we maintain any lists) */
+static int module_load_wait(struct module *mod)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void module_unload_init(struct module *mod)
 {
 }
@@ -1068,11 +1131,11 @@ static const struct kernel_symbol *resolve_symbol(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 
 	sym = find_symbol(name, &owner, &crc,
 			  !(mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE)), true);
-	/* use_module can fail due to OOM,
+	/* link_module can fail due to OOM,
 	   or module initialization or unloading */
 	if (sym) {
 		if (!check_version(sechdrs, versindex, name, mod, crc, owner)
-		    || !use_module(mod, owner))
+		    || !link_module(mod, owner))
 			sym = NULL;
 	}
 	return sym;
@@ -2528,6 +2591,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user *, umod,
 	/* Drop lock so they can recurse */
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
 
+	/*
+	 * Now that we've released the module lock, wait for dependent
+	 * modules to finish loading
+	 */
+	ret = module_load_wait(mod);
+	if (ret)
+		goto unload;
+
 	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
 			MODULE_STATE_COMING, mod);
 
@@ -2535,20 +2606,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user *, umod,
 	/* Start the module */
 	if (mod->init != NULL)
 		ret = do_one_initcall(mod->init);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		/* Init routine failed: abort.  Try to protect us from
-                   buggy refcounters. */
-		mod->state = MODULE_STATE_GOING;
-		synchronize_sched();
-		module_put(mod);
-		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
-					     MODULE_STATE_GOING, mod);
-		mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
-		free_module(mod);
-		mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
-		wake_up(&module_wq);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto unload;
 	if (ret > 0) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING
 "%s: '%s'->init suspiciously returned %d, it should follow 0/-E convention\n"
@@ -2583,6 +2642,20 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user *, umod,
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
+
+unload:
+	/* Initialization failed: abort.  Try to protect us from
+	   buggy refcounters. */
+	mod->state = MODULE_STATE_GOING;
+	synchronize_sched();
+	module_put(mod);
+	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
+				     MODULE_STATE_GOING, mod);
+	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+	free_module(mod);
+	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+	wake_up(&module_wq);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline int within(unsigned long addr, void *start, unsigned long size)
-- 
1.7.1.227.gb676f


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-31 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25 21:00 [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 23:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26  8:00     ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 11:57       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 22:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-26 23:07           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27  5:26           ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 18:46             ` Brandon Philips
2010-05-31  9:40               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:00                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kernel/module.c locking changes Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:01                   ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:02                     ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 16:48                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-31 18:19                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:16                             ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:17                               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-01  1:37                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:42                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  4:00                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:05                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  2:44                               ` Américo Wang
2010-06-01  3:51                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:57                             ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:40                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:27                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:19                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:15                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  1:21                           ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:24                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:22                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 14:58                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 17:53                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 23:24                                     ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-01 23:51                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  2:10                                         ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02  3:03                                           ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  4:35                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:44                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  6:35                                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:45                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  8:12                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  9:07                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  5:52                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:21                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 14:06                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 14:50                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 13:06                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 16:53                                                   ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02 18:01                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03  5:20                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-03 16:24                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  1:02                                                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04  1:55                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  5:20                                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 22:48                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-05  1:49                                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:09                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  4:32                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:56                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  5:52                                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  6:59                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:04                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  5:38                     ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Américo Wang
2010-06-01  5:55                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 21:57             ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-31  7:54               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:23               ` [PATCH] module: fix reference to mod->percpu after freeing module Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:25                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-26 15:41       ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1005311316270.3637@i5.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brandon@ifup.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®