mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c"
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:50:48 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006020750330.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006022336.53024.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>



On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> Found another locking issue: the code which verifies we don't export over
> an existing symbol needs to be atomic wrt. adding us to the list.

Yup.

And now that I'm looking at that call-chain (to see if it would make sense 
to use some other more specific lock - doesn't look like it: all the 
readers are using RCU and this is the only writer), I also give you this 
trivial one-liner. It changes each_symbol() to not put that constant array 
on the stack, resulting in changing

        movq    $C.388.31095, %rsi      #, tmp85
        subq    $376, %rsp      #,
        movq    %rdi, %rbx      # fn, fn
        leaq    -208(%rbp), %rdi        #, tmp84
        movq    %rbx, %rdx      # fn,
        rep movsl
        xorl    %esi, %esi      #
        leaq    -208(%rbp), %rdi        #, tmp87
        movq    %r12, %rcx      # data,
        call    each_symbol_in_section.clone.0  #

into

        xorl    %esi, %esi      #
        subq    $216, %rsp      #,
        movq    %rdi, %rbx      # fn, fn  
        movq    $arr.31078, %rdi        #,
        call    each_symbol_in_section.clone.0  #

which is not so much about being obviously shorter and simpler because we 
don't unnecessarily copy that constant array around onto the stack, but 
also about having a much smaller stack footprint (376 vs 216 bytes - see 
the update of 'rsp').

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

Btw, feel free to consider all those peeling patches signed-off-on, since 
they seem to work.

> And load_module is down to 259 lines.  The label chain at the end is no
> shorter tho :(  I'll leave those cleanups until next merge window.

I don't think it's necessarily bad to have multiple exit targets (although 
9 is pushing it), if the thing is short enough that you can fairly easily 
see how they work. Not that it's quite there yet.

		Linus
---
 kernel/module.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 01e8874..2602264 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ bool each_symbol(bool (*fn)(const struct symsearch *arr, struct module *owner,
 			    unsigned int symnum, void *data), void *data)
 {
 	struct module *mod;
-	const struct symsearch arr[] = {
+	static const struct symsearch arr[] = {
 		{ __start___ksymtab, __stop___ksymtab, __start___kcrctab,
 		  NOT_GPL_ONLY, false },
 		{ __start___ksymtab_gpl, __stop___ksymtab_gpl,

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-02 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25 21:00 [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 23:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26  8:00     ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 11:57       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 22:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-26 23:07           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27  5:26           ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 18:46             ` Brandon Philips
2010-05-31  9:40               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:00                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kernel/module.c locking changes Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:01                   ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:02                     ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 16:48                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-31 18:19                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:16                             ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:17                               ` [PATCH 2/2] module: wait for other modules after dropping the module_mutex Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:37                               ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:42                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  4:00                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:05                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  2:44                               ` Américo Wang
2010-06-01  3:51                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:57                             ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:40                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:27                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:19                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:15                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  1:21                           ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:24                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:22                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 14:58                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 17:53                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 23:24                                     ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-01 23:51                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  2:10                                         ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02  3:03                                           ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  4:35                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:44                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  6:35                                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:45                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  8:12                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  9:07                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  5:52                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:21                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 14:06                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 14:50                                                   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-03 13:06                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 16:53                                                   ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02 18:01                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03  5:20                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-03 16:24                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  1:02                                                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04  1:55                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  5:20                                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 22:48                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-05  1:49                                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:09                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  4:32                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:56                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  5:52                                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  6:59                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:04                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  5:38                     ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Américo Wang
2010-06-01  5:55                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 21:57             ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-31  7:54               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:23               ` [PATCH] module: fix reference to mod->percpu after freeing module Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:25                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-26 15:41       ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1006020750330.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brandon@ifup.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®