From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: floppy driver assumes INITIAL_JIFFIES == 0
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:59:11 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006031355140.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006031204470.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> But I don't see why. I'll dig around the timer stuff a bit more. If it
> only happens with that INITIAL_JIFFIES thing, it must be clearly somehow
> related to a timer happening (or not happening) too early.
Hmm. I don't see anything. In most cases, having whatever variable
pointing to jiffies in the future (which 0 would be for the
INITIAL_JIFFIES case) should be fine - at most it would make the timeout
way too long, not break anything. They tend to be bases for timeouts, ie
you have things like
fd_wait_for_completion(DRS->select_date + DP->select_delay, ...
where we set a timeout based on when we did something.
The one case that seems iffy for is "last_checked", which contains when we
last checked the disk change state. It being in the future could cause
problems, since it would make us think that a disk change state is valid
when it really shouldn't be.
Anyway, does this patch make any difference? It just makes floppy
initialization set up some of those fields too.
Untested. I don't have the hardware.
Linus
---
drivers/block/floppy.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/floppy.c b/drivers/block/floppy.c
index 90c4038..c7e83de 100644
--- a/drivers/block/floppy.c
+++ b/drivers/block/floppy.c
@@ -4180,6 +4180,8 @@ static int __init floppy_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
#endif
+ set_debugt();
+
raw_cmd = NULL;
for (dr = 0; dr < N_DRIVE; dr++) {
@@ -4267,6 +4269,9 @@ static int __init floppy_init(void)
set_bit(FD_DISK_CHANGED_BIT, &UDRS->flags);
set_bit(FD_VERIFY_BIT, &UDRS->flags);
UDRS->fd_device = -1;
+ UDRS->last_checked = jiffies;
+ UDRS->select_date = jiffies;
+ UDRS->spinup_date = jiffies;
floppy_track_buffer = NULL;
max_buffer_sectors = 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 17:15 Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 19:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-03 21:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 22:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 23:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-09 5:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-03 22:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2010-06-03 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04 15:12 ` Nick Bowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1006031355140.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®