mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 22:24:55 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305022211420.25417@ja.ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305022140020.31548@ja.ssi.bg>


	Hello,

On Thu, 2 May 2013, Julian Anastasov wrote:

> 	Note that I'm testing on some 9-year old
> UP system, i.e. 1 CPU. Now I enabled SMP to test CONFIG_TREE_RCU
> and the results are same. I think, it should be just like
> the TINY_RCU in terms of these debuggings (non-preempt). Extra 
> rcu_read_lock gives me "Illegal context switch in RCU read-side
> critical section" in addition to the "BUG: sleeping function
> called from invalid context" message.

	Just to clarify about the test with extra
rcu_read_lock because above paragraph is very confusing:

- The __might_sleep call with PREEMPT_ACTIVE | PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET
just warns with "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context"
because its rcu_sleep_check is silenced. We match the
nesting depth only.

- but __cond_resched -> __schedule -> schedule_debug warns about
the extra rcu_read_lock() with "BUG: scheduling while atomic" and
then with "Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section"
from rcu_sleep_check(0).

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-02 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30  2:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30  2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30  7:12   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-04-30  7:29     ` Simon Horman
2013-04-30  7:52       ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01  9:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 12:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:32             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02  7:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:17             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:29               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-01 15:59                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 16:02                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 16:57                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 17:30                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:22           ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 15:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:22               ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 19:04                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02  7:26                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-02 10:06                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 15:54                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 17:32                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 18:55                       ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:24                         ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2013-05-02 19:34                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 20:19                           ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 22:31                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03  7:52                               ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-03 16:30                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 17:04                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:34                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 18:09                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:47                                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04  7:23                                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 18:03                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-04-30  2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when dumping connections Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1305022211420.25417@ja.ssi.bg \
    --to=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®