mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120933120.3237@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090612132443.GA24002@damson.ad.medicalresearch.no>



On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 
> Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree;

No.

This seems to be 99% merges o fother branches.

I'm no longer pulling from people who can't keep their branches clean and 
develop without pulling from me every other day, or pulling from other 
random branches. If it gets that many conflicts, I just don't want to see 
it - there's something seriously wrong with it.

And if you just merge for some random reason, I don't want to pull it 
either. 

So in either case, I'm not pulling this. 

Just _look_ at that gitk thing. It has several stretches of just "Merge 
branch 'linus' into kmemcheck". WITH NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN BETWEEN!

This release, I'm only going to pull trees that don't do crazy shit.

			Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12 13:31 Vegard Nossum
2009-06-12 13:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 14:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-12 16:41   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 16:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-15 14:59   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-06-16 16:21     ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120933120.3237@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®