mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, paulus@samba.org,
	acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, efault@gmx.de,
	arnd@arndb.de, fweisbec@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Move the 32-bit atomic64_t implementation to a .c file
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0907030942260.3210@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-b7882b7c65abb00194bdb3d4a22d27d70fcc59ba@git.kernel.org>



On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> +int atomic64_add_negative(u64 delta, atomic64_t *ptr)
> +{
> +	long long old_val = atomic64_add_return(delta, ptr);
> +
> +	return old_val < 0;
> +}

Can we please fix this horribly mis-named 'old_val' variable?

It's not 'old_val'. It should be 'new_val' or 'result'.

As it is, the above looks very wrong, and made me think that you had done 
the wrong semantics (ie "xadd" like semantics that literally return the 
pre-add 'old' value).

But on closer inspection, it looks like the code is correct, but the 
naming is just totally wrong.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-03 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-30 21:24 [PATCH] FRV: Wire up new syscalls David Howells
2009-06-30 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 21:41   ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-30 21:54     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:28     ` David Howells
2009-07-01 11:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 12:19       ` David Howells
2009-07-01 12:36         ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-01 12:41         ` David Howells
2009-07-01 13:13           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 14:10           ` David Howells
2009-07-01 14:49             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 16:47               ` [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Implement atomic64_t David Howells
2009-07-01 17:20                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-01 21:11                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 22:57                   ` [PATCH] x86: Code atomic(64)_read and atomic(64)_set in C not CPP [was Re: FRV: Implement atomic64_t] Paul Mackerras
2009-07-02  7:21                     ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Code atomic(64)_read and atomic(64)_set in C not CPP tip-bot for Paul Mackerras
2009-07-02  7:21                     ` [PATCH] x86: Code atomic(64)_read and atomic(64)_set in C not CPP [was Re: FRV: Implement atomic64_t] Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 23:46                   ` [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Implement atomic64_t [ver #2] David Howells
2009-07-01 23:46                   ` [PATCH 2/2] FRV: Add basic performance counter support " David Howells
2009-07-02 21:10                   ` [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Implement atomic64_t Eric Dumazet
2009-07-02 21:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-02 22:08                       ` [PATCH] x86: atomic64_t should be 8 bytes aligned Eric Dumazet
2009-07-02 23:53                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03  6:14                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:42                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: The atomic64_t data type should be 8 bytes aligned on 32-bit too tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 16:58                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03 17:49                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-03 12:42                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Move the 32-bit atomic64_t implementation to a .c file tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 16:47                             ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-07-03 18:31                               ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Clean up atomic64_sub_and_test() and atomic64_add_negative() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 19:18                               ` tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04  0:05                             ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Move the 32-bit atomic64_t implementation to a .c file Paul Mackerras
2009-07-05 11:25                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:43                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve atomic64_read() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 12:43                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve cmpxchg8b() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 12:43                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve atomic64_add_return() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:43                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Reduce size of functions tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:44                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Fix unclean type use in atomic64_xchg() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 17:02                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03 18:00                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:44                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve atomic64_read() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 14:50                             ` [PATCH -tip] x86: atomic64: inline atomic64_read() Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 18:04                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:10                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-03 18:18                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:25                                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-03 18:30                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-07-03 18:43                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:24                                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-03 18:31                                   ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Optimize CMPXCHG8B sequences to not use the LOCK prefix tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:45                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 19:10                                 ` [PATCH -tip] x86: atomic64: inline atomic64_read() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03 19:17                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 19:38                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03 21:40                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:31                               ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Inline atomic64_read() again tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 19:18                               ` tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-04  9:49                               ` tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 12:44                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Code atomic(64)_read and atomic(64)_set in C not CPP tip-bot for Paul Mackerras
2009-07-03 12:48                           ` tip-bot for Paul Mackerras
2009-07-03 12:48                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve atomic64_read() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 15:33                           ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Export APIs to modules tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:30                             ` tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 18:30                             ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] x86: atomic64: Improve atomic64_xchg() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:01                       ` [patch] x86: atomic64_t: Improve atomic64_add_return() Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:26                         ` [PATCH] x86: atomic64_t: _cmpxchg() & _read() optimizations Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 12:40                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 17:38                         ` [patch] x86: atomic64_t: Improve atomic64_add_return() Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03  6:05                     ` [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Implement atomic64_t Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 12:27                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:39                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-07-03 11:17                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 11:26                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 17:33                 ` David Howells
2009-07-01 23:48                 ` David Howells
2009-07-01 16:47               ` [PATCH 2/2] FRV: Add basic performance counter support David Howells
2009-07-01 21:10                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 15:19             ` [PATCH] FRV: Wire up new syscalls David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0907030942260.3210@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®