mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@MIT.EDU>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86-64: Add CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to feature-removal-schedule
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:57:27 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105312056120.3078@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110531183448.GA27166@one.firstfloor.org>

On Tue, 31 May 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +What:	CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS (x86_64)
> > +When:	When glibc 2.14 or newer is ubitquitous.  Perhaps mid-2012.
> > +Why:	Having user-executable code at a fixed address is a security problem.
> > +	Turning off CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS mostly removes the risk but will
> > +	make the time() function slower on glibc versions 2.13 and below.
> 
> I disagree with this description (and the whole idea really)
> 
> First it's time+gettimeofday+vgetcu, not just time.
> 
> A more accurate description is 
> 
> "will make all x86-64 Linux programs written to the original pre
> vDSO syscall ABI significantly slower"
> 
> And the assumption that all world is using glibc is still as bad
> as it was on the first po.st
> 
> And it's still a bad idea. Especially since there's a much better
> alternative anyways for the "security problem" which has none of 
> these drawbacks.

How about posting an alternative patch?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-31 14:13 [PATCH v4 00/10] Remove syscall instructions at fixed addresses Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86-64: Fix alignment of jiffies variable Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86-64: Document some of entry_64.S Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86-64: Give vvars their own page Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 17:17   ` Louis Rilling
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86-64: Remove kernel.vsyscall64 sysctl Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86-64: Map the HPET NX Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] x86-64: Remove vsyscall number 3 (venosys) Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] x86-64: Fill unused parts of the vsyscall page with 0xcc Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] x86-64: Emulate legacy vsyscalls Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 15:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] x86-64: Randomize int 0xcc magic al values at boot Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 15:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 15:56     ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-05-31 16:10       ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-05-31 16:43         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 16:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 18:08         ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-05-31 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86-64: Add CONFIG_UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to feature-removal-schedule Andy Lutomirski
2011-05-31 18:34   ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-31 18:57     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-05-31 18:59     ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-05-31 19:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 19:36         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 20:05           ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-05-31 20:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-08-06 20:18           ` [PATCH v3 " Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-08  8:50       ` [PATCH v4 " Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1105312056120.3078@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@MIT.EDU \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome