* [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup non-shared irq
@ 2013-01-10 15:55 Chuansheng Liu
2013-01-14 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chuansheng Liu @ 2013-01-10 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx; +Cc: linux-kernel, chuansheng.liu
Meet the case when the request_threaded_irq() with the same irq
is called twice continually, get the below mismatch info:
"IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 323"
Here give a right warning that like below:
"Trying to setup already-setup non-shared IRQ 323"
Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index e49a288..6802ce1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -999,6 +999,16 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
old_ptr = &desc->action;
old = *old_ptr;
if (old) {
+ /* Give warning when setup an irq which has been setup
+ * already.
+ */
+ if (!(old->flags & IRQF_SHARED)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ WARN(1, "Trying to setup already-setup non-shared IRQ %d\n",
+ irq);
+ goto out_mask;
+ }
+
/*
* Can't share interrupts unless both agree to and are
* the same type (level, edge, polarity). So both flag
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup non-shared irq
2013-01-10 15:55 [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup non-shared irq Chuansheng Liu
@ 2013-01-14 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-15 0:54 ` Liu, Chuansheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2013-01-14 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuansheng Liu; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
>
> Meet the case when the request_threaded_irq() with the same irq
> is called twice continually, get the below mismatch info:
> "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 323"
I have no idea where you get that from. The mismatch is printed with:
if (!(new->flags & IRQF_PROBE_SHARED)) {
pr_err("Flags mismatch irq %d. %08x (%s) vs. %08x (%s)\n",
irq, new->flags, new->name, old->flags, old->name);
And its only printed when IRQF_PROBE_SHARED is not set. Your change
would cause printouts where no printouts are due and it'd change the
return value from EBUSY to EINVAL.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup non-shared irq
2013-01-14 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2013-01-15 0:54 ` Liu, Chuansheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Chuansheng @ 2013-01-15 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-kernel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:16 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup
> non-shared irq
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > Meet the case when the request_threaded_irq() with the same irq
> > is called twice continually, get the below mismatch info:
> > "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 323"
>
> I have no idea where you get that from. The mismatch is printed with:
>
> if (!(new->flags & IRQF_PROBE_SHARED)) {
> pr_err("Flags mismatch irq %d. %08x (%s) vs. %08x (%s)\n",
> irq, new->flags, new->name, old->flags,
> old->name);
if (!(new->flags & IRQF_PROBE_SHARED)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ %d\n", irq);
if (old_name)
printk(KERN_ERR "current handler: %s\n", old_name);
dump_stack();
}
The "IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 323" message is coming from the above code,
which is something older than you pasted, but it is the same place.
>
> And its only printed when IRQF_PROBE_SHARED is not set. Your change
> would cause printouts where no printouts are due and it'd change the
> return value from EBUSY to EINVAL.
My test case is below:
request_irq(323, func1,
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING,
name, dev);
After succeeded, then called it again:
request_irq(323, func1,
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING,
name, dev);
After the test case, I will get the "mismatch" info.
But in this case, it should not be the "mismatch" case, so I want to give another warning
in case of duplicated setup the same irq with non-shared.
Not sure if it is right. Thanks your pointing out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-15 0:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-10 15:55 [PATCH] genirq: Give warning when setup an already-setup non-shared irq Chuansheng Liu
2013-01-14 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-01-15 0:54 ` Liu, Chuansheng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®