From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep()
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:33:07 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1801171532510.11282@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151538209372.23920.9644158038491397506.stgit@noble>
> When 'back_to_sleep()' is passed as the 'timeout' function,
> the effect is to wait indefinitely for the event, polling
> once after the timeout.
> If LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP is given, then after the timeout
> we allow fatal signals to interrupt the wait.
>
> Make this more obvious in both places "back_to_sleep()" is
> used but using two explicit sleeps.
>
> The code in ptlrpcd_add_req() looks odd - why not just have one
> wait_event_idle()? However I believe this is a faithful
> transformation of the existing code.
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h | 4 ----
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/import.c | 11 ++++++-----
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c | 9 +++++----
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
> index b2a64d0e682c..1939e959b92a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_lib.h
> @@ -140,10 +140,6 @@ void target_send_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req, int rc, int fail_id);
> * XXX nikita: some ptlrpc daemon threads have races of that sort.
> *
> */
> -static inline int back_to_sleep(void *arg)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
>
> #define LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP ((void (*)(void *))(-1))
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/import.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/import.c
> index 5d62c9de27eb..faf0f606f013 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/import.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/import.c
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,6 @@ int ptlrpc_disconnect_import(struct obd_import *imp, int noclose)
> }
>
> if (ptlrpc_import_in_recovery(imp)) {
> - struct l_wait_info lwi;
> long timeout;
>
> if (AT_OFF) {
> @@ -1510,10 +1509,12 @@ int ptlrpc_disconnect_import(struct obd_import *imp, int noclose)
> timeout = at_get(&imp->imp_at.iat_service_estimate[idx]) * HZ;
> }
>
> - lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(cfs_timeout_cap(timeout),
> - back_to_sleep, LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP, NULL);
> - rc = l_wait_event(imp->imp_recovery_waitq,
> - !ptlrpc_import_in_recovery(imp), &lwi);
> + if (wait_event_idle_timeout(imp->imp_recovery_waitq,
> + !ptlrpc_import_in_recovery(imp),
> + cfs_timeout_cap(timeout)) == 0)
> + l_wait_event_abortable(
> + imp->imp_recovery_waitq,
> + !ptlrpc_import_in_recovery(imp));
> }
>
> spin_lock(&imp->imp_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
> index dad2f9290f70..437b4b2a9072 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/ptlrpcd.c
> @@ -230,12 +230,13 @@ void ptlrpcd_add_req(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
>
> spin_lock(&req->rq_lock);
> if (req->rq_invalid_rqset) {
> - struct l_wait_info lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT(5 * HZ,
> - back_to_sleep, NULL);
> -
> req->rq_invalid_rqset = 0;
> spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
> - l_wait_event(req->rq_set_waitq, !req->rq_set, &lwi);
> + if (wait_event_idle_timeout(req->rq_set_waitq,
> + !req->rq_set,
> + 5 * HZ) == 0)
> + wait_event_idle(req->rq_set_waitq,
> + !req->rq_set);
> } else if (req->rq_set) {
> /* If we have a valid "rq_set", just reuse it to avoid double
> * linked.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 3:28 [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 07/19] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:29 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 12/19] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:33 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:33 ` James Simmons [this message]
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 16/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:35 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/wait: add wait_event_idle() functions NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:26 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 17/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 10/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:32 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 06/19] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:30 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 03/19] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:27 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 04/19] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2018-01-08 16:52 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 17:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 18:04 ` James Simmons
2018-01-09 8:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-17 15:29 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:32 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 13/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:34 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:34 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 15/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:35 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 02/19] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:26 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 05/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:27 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 08/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:31 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 18/19] staging: lustre: replace l_wait_event_exclusive_head() with wait_event_idle_exclusive NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 14:59 ` [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 16:21 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 16:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 18:06 ` James Simmons
2018-01-09 8:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-09 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:24 ` James Simmons
2018-02-12 21:22 [PATCH 00/19] RESEND " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1801171532510.11282@casper.infradead.org \
--to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®