From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:34:46 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1801171534340.11282@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151538209383.23920.18027403730394945280.stgit@noble>
> Replace l_wait_event with wait_event_idle_timeout() and call the
> handler function explicitly. This makes it more clear
> what is happening.
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> index 617e004d00f8..90e3b3022106 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c
> @@ -554,9 +554,8 @@ int ctx_check_refresh(struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx)
> }
>
> static
> -int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
> +int ctx_refresh_timeout(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
> {
> - struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
> int rc;
>
> /* conn_cnt is needed in expire_one_request */
> @@ -575,10 +574,8 @@ int ctx_refresh_timeout(void *data)
> }
>
> static
> -void ctx_refresh_interrupt(void *data)
> +void ctx_refresh_interrupt(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
> {
> - struct ptlrpc_request *req = data;
> -
> spin_lock(&req->rq_lock);
> req->rq_intr = 1;
> spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
> @@ -611,7 +608,6 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
> {
> struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *ctx = req->rq_cli_ctx;
> struct ptlrpc_sec *sec;
> - struct l_wait_info lwi;
> int rc;
>
> LASSERT(ctx);
> @@ -743,10 +739,28 @@ int sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx(struct ptlrpc_request *req, long timeout)
> req->rq_restart = 0;
> spin_unlock(&req->rq_lock);
>
> - lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(msecs_to_jiffies(timeout * MSEC_PER_SEC),
> - ctx_refresh_timeout, ctx_refresh_interrupt,
> - req);
> - rc = l_wait_event(req->rq_reply_waitq, ctx_check_refresh(ctx), &lwi);
> + rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(req->rq_reply_waitq,
> + ctx_check_refresh(ctx),
> + timeout * HZ);
> + if (rc == 0 && ctx_refresh_timeout(req) == 0) {
> + /* Keep waiting, but enable some signals */
> + rc = l_wait_event_abortable(req->rq_reply_waitq,
> + ctx_check_refresh(ctx));
> + if (rc == 0)
> + rc = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (rc > 0)
> + /* condition is true */
> + rc = 0;
> + else if (rc == 0)
> + /* Timed out */
> + rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + else {
> + /* Aborted by signal */
> + rc = -EINTR;
> + ctx_refresh_interrupt(req);
> + }
>
> /*
> * following cases could lead us here:
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 3:28 [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 15/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:35 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 13/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:34 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 03/19] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:27 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 05/19] staging: lustre: use wait_event_idle_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:27 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 04/19] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2018-01-08 16:52 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 17:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 18:04 ` James Simmons
2018-01-09 8:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-17 15:29 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 16/19] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:35 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 09/19] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:32 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/wait: add wait_event_idle() functions NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:26 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 17/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 11/19] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:33 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 07/19] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:29 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 10/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:32 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:34 ` James Simmons [this message]
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 08/19] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:31 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 02/19] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:26 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 12/19] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:33 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 06/19] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:30 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 19/19] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event() and related code NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 3:28 ` [PATCH 18/19] staging: lustre: replace l_wait_event_exclusive_head() with wait_event_idle_exclusive NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:36 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 14:59 ` [PATCH 5 v2: 00/19] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 16:21 ` James Simmons
2018-01-08 16:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-08 18:06 ` James Simmons
2018-01-09 8:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-09 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2018-01-17 15:24 ` James Simmons
2018-02-12 21:22 [PATCH 00/19] RESEND " NeilBrown
2018-02-12 23:47 ` [PATCH 14/19] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1801171534340.11282@casper.infradead.org \
--to=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®