From: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.18-rc* regression: x86-32 troubles (with timers?)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:54:47 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807051254050.21817@math.ut.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1RkNc_kShHBJ6QENrQheQi=C93DmnknC1S_uJDcTDqww@mail.gmail.com>
> > I tried 4.18.0-rc1-00023-g9ffc59d57228 and now
> > 4.18.0-rc3-00113-gfc36def997cf on a 32-bit server and then some other
> > 32-bit machines, and got half-failed bootup - kernel and userspace come
> > up but some services fail to start, including network and
> > systemd-journald:
> >
> > systemd-journald[85]: Assertion 'clock_gettime(map_clock_id(clock_id), &ts) == 0' failed at ../src/basic/time-util.c:53, function now(). Aborting.
> >
> > I then tried multiple other machines. All x86-64 machines seem
> > unaffected, some x86-32 machines are affected (Athlon with AMD750
> > chipset, Fujitsu RX100-S2 with P4-3.4, and P4 with Intel 865 chipset),
> > some very similar x86-32 machines are unaffected. I have different
> > customized kernel configuration on them, so far I have not pinpointed
> > any configuration option to be at fault.
> >
> > All machines run Debian unstable.
> >
> > 4.17.0 was working fine.
> >
> > Will continue with bisecting between 4.17.0 and
> > 4.18.0-rc1-00023-g9ffc59d57228.
>
> That does sound like it is related to my patches indeed. If you are not
> yet done bisecting, please checkout commit e27c49291a7f ("x86: Convert
> x86_platform_ops to timespec64") before you try anything else, that
> one is the top of the branch with my changes. If that fails, the bisection
> will be much quicker.
This commit was fine. So it's likely something else.
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-05 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-04 11:41 Meelis Roos
2018-07-04 21:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-05 9:54 ` Meelis Roos [this message]
2018-07-05 11:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-15 15:05 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-15 20:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-16 16:49 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-16 19:00 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-20 20:56 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-20 23:01 ` bisected: " Meelis Roos
2018-07-23 16:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-23 19:41 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-23 20:34 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-23 22:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-24 4:47 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-24 18:40 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-07-24 6:11 ` Meelis Roos
2018-07-10 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2018-07-10 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1807051254050.21817@math.ut.ee \
--to=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®