"move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text" considered trivial?

"move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text" considered trivial?

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

I just noticed that my patch

	move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text

is in your trivial queue (as c4fd30f9).  I'm happy that you took that,
but I wonder if this is really trivial material considering that some of
these patches were nacked.

If you still think it's trivial you can take my other ~35 patches doing
the same for other drivers.

At some point Greg signaled that he would take the series but he seems
too much buried in other work. :-/

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Re: "move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text" considered trivial?

[Jiri Kosina]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 532 bytes --]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> I just noticed that my patch
> 
> 	move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text
> 
> is in your trivial queue (as c4fd30f9).  I'm happy that you took that,
> but I wonder if this is really trivial material considering that some of
> these patches were nacked.

This one was Acked by the maintainer of the driver, therefore it is OK to 
take it through trivial tree, see the trivial patch monkey guidelines in 
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Re: "move stk17ta8's probe function to .devinit.text" considered trivial?

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hallo,

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 05:07:12PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> This one was Acked by the maintainer of the driver, therefore it is OK to 
> take it through trivial tree, see the trivial patch monkey guidelines in 
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Ah, OK, that's new to me.

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |