mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] shm: Fix unlikely() test of info->seals to test only for WRITE and GROW
@ 2017-02-03 15:56 Steven Rostedt (VMware)
  2017-02-04 22:51 ` Hugh Dickins
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) @ 2017-02-03 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML; +Cc: Andrew Morton, David Herrmann, Hugh Dickins

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Running my likely/unlikely profiler, I discovered that the test in
shmem_write_begin() that tests for info->seals as unlikely, is
always incorrect. This is because shmem_get_inode() sets info->seals to
have F_SEAL_SEAL set by default, and it is unlikely to be cleared when
shmem_write_begin() is called. Thus, the if statement is very likely.

But as the if statement block only cares about F_SEAL_WRITE and
F_SEAL_GROW, change the test to only test those two bits.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index bb53285..ef4cdbb 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
 	pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
 	/* i_mutex is held by caller */
-	if (unlikely(info->seals)) {
+	if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_GROW))) {
 		if (info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)
 			return -EPERM;
 		if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW) && pos + len > inode->i_size)
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] shm: Fix unlikely() test of info->seals to test only for WRITE and GROW
  2017-02-03 15:56 [PATCH] shm: Fix unlikely() test of info->seals to test only for WRITE and GROW Steven Rostedt (VMware)
@ 2017-02-04 22:51 ` Hugh Dickins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2017-02-04 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt (VMware); +Cc: LKML, Andrew Morton, David Herrmann, Hugh Dickins

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Steven Rostedt (VMware) wrote:

> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Running my likely/unlikely profiler, I discovered that the test in
> shmem_write_begin() that tests for info->seals as unlikely, is
> always incorrect. This is because shmem_get_inode() sets info->seals to
> have F_SEAL_SEAL set by default, and it is unlikely to be cleared when
> shmem_write_begin() is called. Thus, the if statement is very likely.
> 
> But as the if statement block only cares about F_SEAL_WRITE and
> F_SEAL_GROW, change the test to only test those two bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>

> ---
>  mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index bb53285..ef4cdbb 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
>  	pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>  	/* i_mutex is held by caller */
> -	if (unlikely(info->seals)) {
> +	if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_GROW))) {
>  		if (info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)
>  			return -EPERM;
>  		if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW) && pos + len > inode->i_size)
> -- 
> 2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-04 22:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-03 15:56 [PATCH] shm: Fix unlikely() test of info->seals to test only for WRITE and GROW Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2017-02-04 22:51 ` Hugh Dickins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®