Re: [scsi-qedf] question about parameter ordering

[Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@cavium.com>]

On Wed, 3 May 2017, 1:58pm, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> While looking into Coverity ID 1402011 I ran into the following piece of code
> at drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_io.c:2057:
> 
> /* Fill FC header */
> fc_hdr = &(tm_req->req_fc_hdr);
> sid = fcport->sid;
> did = fcport->rdata->ids.port_id;
> __fc_fill_fc_hdr(fc_hdr, FC_RCTL_DD_UNSOL_CMD, sid, did,
>                   FC_TYPE_FCP, FC_FC_FIRST_SEQ | FC_FC_END_SEQ |
>                   FC_FC_SEQ_INIT, 0);
> 
> The issue here is that the position of arguments in the call to
> __fc_fill_fc_hdr() function do not match the ordering of the parameters:
> 
> _sid_ is passed to _did_
> _did_ is passed to _sid_
> 
> this is the function prototype:
> 
> static inline void __fc_fill_fc_hdr(struct fc_frame_header *fh,
>                                    enum fc_rctl r_ctl,
>                                    u32 did, u32 sid, enum fc_fh_type type,
>                                    u32 f_ctl, u32 parm_offset)
> 
> My question here is if this is intentionala?

This may have been but this code has been superseded by commit 	
be086e7c53f1fac51eed14523b28f2214b548dd2.B
> 
> In case it is not, I will send a patch to fix it. But first it would be great
> to hear any comment about it.
> 
> By the way... the same is happening at drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_els.c:109

May be a bug here so you could send a patch.

> 
> Thank you
> --
> Gustavo A. R. Silva
> 
> 
> 
>