mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] alarmtimers: Handle late rtc module loading
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:09:56 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1106202308050.29718@math.ut.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308335616.3606.4.camel@work-vm>

> > One the PC, I get the following about RTC in dmesg:
> > 
> > [    0.319145] drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
> > [    3.614132] rtc_cmos 00:03: RTC can wake from S4
> > [    3.614480] rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
> > [    3.614582] rtc0: alarms up to one year, y3k, 114 bytes nvram
> 
> I'll double check, but I suspect that "unable to open rtc device"
> message isn't new. The issue is that the rtc_cmos driver is built as a
> module, and the hctosys functionality is running before the module is
> loaded.

Yes. But I consider this a configuration error - to load modular rtc 
driver and expect boottime clock setting from it works. It was by 
mistake - the boottime options came later in time. Changed it to 
statically compiled in PC CMOS RTC and it works fine.

> Hmmm. This maybe points to the need for some sort of callback system for
> when RTC devices are registered. Since most existing code is just hoping
> its available by late_init.

Is it really necessary?

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-20 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-17  1:34 John Stultz
2011-06-17  9:43 ` Meelis Roos
2011-06-17 18:33   ` John Stultz
2011-06-18  0:13     ` john stultz
2011-06-20 20:09     ` Meelis Roos [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.SOC.1.00.1106202308050.29718@math.ut.ee \
    --to=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®