From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Honghui Jiang <jiang_hh2019@163.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: Fix DMA mapping ownership on partial map failure
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:28:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an8J33wZ102xcOro@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814031419.43378-1-jiang_hh2019@163.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:14:14AM +0800, Honghui Jiang wrote:
> A partial DMA mapping failure can leave per-transfer mapping flags set
> while cur_{tx,rx}_dma_dev are NULL or still refer to the devices used
> for an earlier message. The subsequent cleanup may then unmap a
> transfer with a NULL or stale device.
>
> Before commit e289df82344f ("spi: Rework per message DMA mapped flag to
> be per transfer"), partial-failure handling was already incomplete, but
> __spi_unmap_msg() was gated by cur_msg_mapped, which was set only after
> the whole message mapped successfully. Earlier mappings could leak, but
> cleanup could not unmap them with an unpublished device. The
> per-transfer conversion removed that gate: mapping flags can now remain
> set while cur_{tx,rx}_dma_dev are still unpublished, turning the leak
> into a NULL- or stale-device unmap regression.
>
> Patch 1 publishes the mapping devices before the loop and unwinds every
> failure through __spi_unmap_msg(). It keeps the forward declaration so
> it is independently buildable and straightforward to backport. Patch 2
> then removes the declaration by moving __spi_unmap_msg() above
> __spi_map_msg(). Patch 3 clears the current DMA device pointers once the
> message has been unmapped, while leaving them intact during partial-map
> unwind and DMA-to-PIO fallback. Patch 4 adds the DMA mapping KUnit suite
> as a separate translation unit.
>
> Only patch 1 is a stable candidate; patches 2 through 4 are follow-up
> cleanup and test changes for mainline.
>
> Testing:
>
> - Patch 1 builds independently with the x86_64 reproducer configuration.
> - The spi_dma KUnit suite passes all four cases on x86_64 and UML.
> Moving the DMA device assignments back after the mapping loop makes
> both failure-path cases fail.
> - The default and all-tests KUnit configurations both select the suite.
> - All four reproducer cases complete without an oops when run as the
> first message, and map/unmap counts are balanced after a successful
> first message.
> - After message cleanup, cur_{tx,rx}_dma_dev are NULL.
Nice series!
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
with a caveat that there is one stray change in the last patch.
Assumed that in v3 it will be dropped.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 3:14 Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: Move __spi_unmap_msg() before __spi_map_msg() Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: Clear current DMA devices when unmapping a message Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 3:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: Add KUnit coverage for DMA mapping error paths Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 12:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-14 12:49 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-14 17:38 ` Honghui Jiang
2026-08-14 17:41 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-15 2:32 ` David Gow
2026-08-14 12:28 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-08-14 15:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: Fix DMA mapping ownership on partial map failure Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an8J33wZ102xcOro@ashevche-desk.local \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=jiang_hh2019@163.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®