* [PATCH] fuse: fix GCC 8 build with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
@ 2026-08-11 19:57 Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-27 4:02 ` Karl Mehltretter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Karl Mehltretter @ 2026-08-11 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi, fuse-devel
Cc: Karl Mehltretter, Joanne Koong, Jingbo Xu, Darrick J. Wong,
linux-kernel, stable
Commit 25307ca50b815 ("fuse: simplify logic in fuse_notify_store() and
fuse_retrieve()") introduced a loff_t cursor and used it in place of
outarg's offset field. In the min() expression this changed the second
operand from unsigned to signed.
With CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES, GCC 8 does not propagate the range
established by the preceding MAX_LFS_FILESIZE check through the branch
profiling code. Consequently, min() cannot prove that the signed operand
is nonnegative and rejects the mixed-signedness comparison:
min(outarg.size, ((loff_t)((long long)(~0ULL >> 1))) - pos)
signedness error
This happens with GCC 8.1 on x86-64 and GCC 8.5 on arm and s390.
GCC 8.1 remains the minimum supported compiler.
Use umin(), which is intended for comparing an unsigned value with a
signed value that is known to be nonnegative. The preceding bounds check
guarantees that MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - pos is nonnegative, and outarg.size
bounds the result to unsigned int.
Fixes: 25307ca50b815 ("fuse: simplify logic in fuse_notify_store() and fuse_retrieve()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
---
Testing:
- Fails without the patch and builds with it: GCC 8.1.0 on x86-64 and
GCC 8.5.0 on arm and s390, each with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES set
- Builds either way on GCC 14 and GCC 15 on x86-64, GCC 15 on s390 and
Clang 21 on x86-64
- With the preceding bounds check, umin() changes the signed comparison
to an equivalent unsigned comparison. Instruction counts are unchanged
on all tested targets
- Reproducer: defconfig plus FUSE_FS, FTRACE, TRACING and
PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES, then build fs/fuse/notify.o
Stable backport note: in v7.1 the affected code is in fs/fuse/dev.c
fs/fuse/notify.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/notify.c b/fs/fuse/notify.c
index 29578104ae6cd..3370ae344f751 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/notify.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/notify.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int fuse_notify_store(struct fuse_conn *fc, unsigned int size,
nodeid = outarg.nodeid;
pos = outarg.offset;
- num = min(outarg.size, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - pos);
+ num = umin(outarg.size, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - pos);
down_read(&fc->killsb);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] fuse: fix GCC 8 build with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
2026-08-11 19:57 [PATCH] fuse: fix GCC 8 build with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES Karl Mehltretter
@ 2026-08-27 4:02 ` Karl Mehltretter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Karl Mehltretter @ 2026-08-27 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi, fuse-devel
Cc: Joanne Koong, Jingbo Xu, Darrick J. Wong, linux-kernel, stable
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 09:57:33PM +0100, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> Fixes: 25307ca50b815 ("fuse: simplify logic in fuse_notify_store() and fuse_retrieve()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Just a friendly ping in case this got missed.
Thanks,
Karl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-27 4:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-11 19:57 [PATCH] fuse: fix GCC 8 build with CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-27 4:02 ` Karl Mehltretter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®