From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Priyank Rathod <rathodpriyank@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@mailbox.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Fix struct pci_dev reference leak in aer_process_err_devices()
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:14:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apSdOnbdLdrJ7ksF@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830-fix-aer-refcount-leak-v1-1-64e1013add12@google.com>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 08:28:28PM +0000, Priyank Rathod wrote:
> If is_error_source() matches a device purely by Requester/Completer ID
> match (e_info->id == pci_dev_id(dev)), the device is added to e_info->dev[]
> even if it lacks the AER extended capability (dev->aer_cap == 0).
Hallucination, we do not enable error reporting on devices without
AER capability, see pci_aer_init().
> Later, during aer_process_err_devices(), aer_get_device_error_info()
> returns 0 when dev->aer_cap is 0 (or if no active error status is read),
The "no active error status is read" is the only scenario where
this *could* happen. However if no error bits are set in the
status register, why did the device send an error message upstream
in the first place? That would be a broken device.
Another theoretical possibility would be that the device becomes
inaccessible by the time aer_get_device_error_info() reads the
status/mask registers. They'd both be read as "all ones",
hence info->status & ~info->mask == 0.
> On the ID-match fast path (a), is_error_source() returns true without
> checking whether the device implements the AER extended capability
> (dev->aer_cap != 0). This creates a real, non-exotic situation in several
> common hardware topologies and operational states:
Hallucination, this is by no means "real, non-exotic",
it's an unlikely corner case.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 20:28 Priyank Rathod
2026-08-30 21:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2026-08-30 21:14 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2026-08-31 3:24 ` Priyank Rathod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apSdOnbdLdrJ7ksF@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=rathodpriyank@google.com \
--cc=stefan.roese@mailbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®