From: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2] ppp_async: drop the errored frame instead of resetting its headroom
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:21:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apkR6ZU+tqP2C3Fl@griffin.linux.hr> (raw)
ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() prepends a two-byte direction tag before running
the pass/active BPF filters:
*(__be16 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = htons(PPP_FILTER_INBOUND_TAG);
Nothing on the receive path guarantees those two bytes of headroom. The
frame-error path in ppp_async's process_input_packet() resets a reused skb's
headroom to zero while claiming to restore it to a freshly allocated state -
but a fresh skb from dev_alloc_skb() carries NET_SKB_PAD:
err:
if (skb) {
/* make skb appear as freshly allocated */
skb_trim(skb, 0);
skb_reserve(skb, - skb_headroom(skb));
}
ap->rpkt still points at that skb, so the next frame is reassembled into it
with no headroom at all. A peer that sends a bad-FCS frame followed by one
beginning ff 03 then leaves a single byte of headroom by the time the filter
tag is pushed, which lands one byte below skb->head:
skbuff: skb_under_panic: len:49 put:2 head:ffff888003c10000
data:ffff888003c0ffff tail:0x30 end:0x640 dev:<NULL>
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214!
RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x13e/0x230
Call Trace:
skb_push+0xbd/0x100
ppp_receive_nonmp_frame+0x48a/0x1d10
ppp_input+0x4e9/0x2f80
ppp_async_process+0x2a/0xe0
tasklet_action_common+0x20f/0x8a0
handle_softirqs+0x18e/0x590
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Zeroing the headroom violates the NET_SKB_PAD guarantee that dev_alloc_skb()
gives the rest of the receive path. Besides the filter panic above, when CCP
compression is enabled ppp_decompress_frame() hands skb->data - 2 to
->decompress()/->incomp(), which then reads out of bounds before skb->head
for the same reason.
Rather than restore the headroom, drop the errored frame - as ppp_synctty
already does on its error path - and clear ap->rpkt so the next frame is
reassembled into a fresh skb with proper headroom. This is simpler and fixes
both the filter under-panic and the CCP out-of-bounds read.
The original V1 of this patch made room in ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() with
skb_cow_head(); Eric pointed out that fixing the root cause in the transport
is the right approach.
Found by fuzzing the PPP receive path with a mutating peer on a pty; it is an
interesting (remote) DoS: root configures PPP, the peer supplies two crashing
frames. The reproducer (repro-ppp-skb.c, unchanged from v1) panics in about a
second, and returns cleanly with this applied.
Fixes: 6722e78c9005 ("[PPP]: handle misaligned accesses")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>
---
v2:
- drop the frame in ppp_async instead of making headroom in ppp_generic
(Eric Dumazet); this also fixes the ppp_decompress_frame() skb->data - 2
out-of-bounds read that the same headroom reset caused
- Fixes: the commit that introduced the skb_reserve() reset, not 2.6.12-rc2
- [PATCH net]
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAPAw8HE6QgnePG=UUfU2d9mYXNpY2O_kp5v0J82VuVoR6gwWOg@mail.gmail.com/
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
@@ -812,9 +812,6 @@ process_input_packet(struct asyncppp *ap)
err:
/* frame had an error, remember that, reset SC_TOSS & SC_ESCAPE */
ap->state = SC_PREV_ERROR;
- if (skb) {
- /* make skb appear as freshly allocated */
- skb_trim(skb, 0);
- skb_reserve(skb, - skb_headroom(skb));
- }
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ ap->rpkt = NULL;
}
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 6:21 Vlatko Kosturjak [this message]
2026-09-03 8:24 ` Qingfang Deng
2026-09-03 8:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apkR6ZU+tqP2C3Fl@griffin.linux.hr \
--to=kost@linux.hr \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®