mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
To: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>,
	linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ppp_async: drop the errored frame instead of resetting its headroom
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:24:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e10b5f72-adbd-46a5-9364-3580ff16a765@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apkR6ZU+tqP2C3Fl@griffin.linux.hr>

Hi,

On 2026/9/3 14:21, Vlatko Kosturjak wrote:
> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() prepends a two-byte direction tag before running
> the pass/active BPF filters:
>
> 	*(__be16 *)skb_push(skb, 2) = htons(PPP_FILTER_INBOUND_TAG);
>
> Nothing on the receive path guarantees those two bytes of headroom. The
> frame-error path in ppp_async's process_input_packet() resets a reused skb's
> headroom to zero while claiming to restore it to a freshly allocated state -
> but a fresh skb from dev_alloc_skb() carries NET_SKB_PAD:
>
> 	err:
> 		if (skb) {
> 			/* make skb appear as freshly allocated */
> 			skb_trim(skb, 0);
> 			skb_reserve(skb, - skb_headroom(skb));
> 		}
>
> ap->rpkt still points at that skb, so the next frame is reassembled into it
> with no headroom at all. A peer that sends a bad-FCS frame followed by one
> beginning ff 03 then leaves a single byte of headroom by the time the filter
> tag is pushed, which lands one byte below skb->head:
>
>    skbuff: skb_under_panic: len:49 put:2 head:ffff888003c10000
>            data:ffff888003c0ffff tail:0x30 end:0x640 dev:<NULL>
>    kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:214!
>    RIP: 0010:skb_panic+0x13e/0x230
>    Call Trace:
>     skb_push+0xbd/0x100
>     ppp_receive_nonmp_frame+0x48a/0x1d10
>     ppp_input+0x4e9/0x2f80
>     ppp_async_process+0x2a/0xe0
>     tasklet_action_common+0x20f/0x8a0
>     handle_softirqs+0x18e/0x590
>    Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> Zeroing the headroom violates the NET_SKB_PAD guarantee that dev_alloc_skb()
> gives the rest of the receive path. Besides the filter panic above, when CCP
> compression is enabled ppp_decompress_frame() hands skb->data - 2 to
> ->decompress()/->incomp(), which then reads out of bounds before skb->head
> for the same reason.
>
> Rather than restore the headroom, drop the errored frame - as ppp_synctty
> already does on its error path - and clear ap->rpkt so the next frame is
> reassembled into a fresh skb with proper headroom. This is simpler and fixes
> both the filter under-panic and the CCP out-of-bounds read.
>
> The original V1 of this patch made room in ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() with
> skb_cow_head(); Eric pointed out that fixing the root cause in the transport
> is the right approach.
>
> Found by fuzzing the PPP receive path with a mutating peer on a pty; it is an
> interesting (remote) DoS: root configures PPP, the peer supplies two crashing
> frames. The reproducer (repro-ppp-skb.c, unchanged from v1) panics in about a
> second, and returns cleanly with this applied.
>
> Fixes: 6722e78c9005 ("[PPP]: handle misaligned accesses")

Nit: the skb->len == 0 alignment check introduced by said commit is now 
redundant and can be moved back into the allocation branch.

> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlatko Kosturjak <kost@linux.hr>
Kind regards,

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03  6:21 Vlatko Kosturjak
2026-09-03  8:24 ` Qingfang Deng [this message]
2026-09-03  8:44 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e10b5f72-adbd-46a5-9364-3580ff16a765@linux.dev \
    --to=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kost@linux.hr \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®