From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Lee Trager <ltrager@nvidia.com>, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Add asymmetric SMT packing override
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:27:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq2CqGXjH_lrZVnS@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtD6i7BMpfnj4pEPJMMOSXyMWL63YDX00d+jRTn0x+ot7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 06:03:53PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
...
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > index 33cd30996e47e..36c3b2e563441 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > @@ -6799,6 +6799,17 @@ Kernel parameters
> > > solution to mutex-based priority inversion.
> > > Format: <bool>
> > >
> > > + sched_smt_asym_packing= [KNL,SMP]
> > > + Override asymmetric packing at the SMT scheduling domain.
> > > + Format: { auto | on | off }
> > > + auto: Preserve the architecture default. This is the
> > > + default when the option is omitted.
>
> AFAICT "auto" equals nothing added in the command line so why is it needed ?
Right, auto is redundant. Omitting the parameter already preserves the topology
provided by the architecture or firmware.
>
> > > + on: Force asymmetric packing at the SMT scheduling domain.
> > > + Idle CPU selection prefers siblings with a higher
> > > + architecture-defined priority. Siblings with equal
> > > + priorities remain unordered.
> > > + off: Ignore SMT sibling priorities.
>
> Is this for debugging purposes?
Yes, that was the intent, but I don't have a concrete use case that justifies
exposing it.
>
> only the sched_smt_asym_packing=on is really useful to force
> asym_packing when firmware doesn't provide the info
Agreed. I'll simplify the interface to an explicit force option for systems
whose firmware can't describe the SMT preference.
Thanks,
-Andrea
>
> > > +
> >
> > Wasn't this option/parameter to come from arch specific file?
> >
> > Isn't it going to be confusing for archs which don't benefit from asym packing at SMT,
> > but now there is kernel parameter to say on.
> >
> > > sched_verbose [KNL,EARLY] Enables verbose scheduler debug messages.
> > >
> > > schedstats= [KNL,X86] Enable or disable scheduled statistics.
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > index 0248227d983a7..cdfcecf673fd7 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,46 @@ static int __init sched_debug_setup(char *str)
> > > }
> > > early_param("sched_verbose", sched_debug_setup);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > > +enum sched_smt_asym_packing_mode {
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF,
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static enum sched_smt_asym_packing_mode sched_smt_asym_packing __read_mostly =
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO;
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const sched_smt_asym_packing_modes[SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR] = {
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_AUTO] = "auto",
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON] = "on",
> > > + [SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF] = "off",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int __init sched_smt_asym_packing_parse(const char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + for (int mode = 0; mode < SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_NR; mode++) {
> > > + if (!strcmp(str, sched_smt_asym_packing_modes[mode]))
> > > + return mode;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __init setup_sched_smt_asym_packing(char *str)
> > > +{
> > > + int mode = sched_smt_asym_packing_parse(str);
> > > +
> > > + if (mode < 0)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + sched_smt_asym_packing = mode;
> > > + return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +__setup("sched_smt_asym_packing=", setup_sched_smt_asym_packing);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > static inline bool sched_debug(void)
> > > {
> > > return sched_debug_verbose;
> > > @@ -1950,6 +1990,15 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
> > > if (WARN_ONCE(sd_flags & ~TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS,
> > > "wrong sd_flags in topology description\n"))
> > > sd_flags &= TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> > > + if (sd_flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY) {
> > > + if (sched_smt_asym_packing == SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_ON)
> > > + sd_flags |= SD_ASYM_PACKING;
> > > + else if (sched_smt_asym_packing ==
> > > + SCHED_SMT_ASYM_PACKING_OFF)
> > > + sd_flags &= ~SD_ASYM_PACKING;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> > > sd_flags |= asym_cpu_capacity_classify(sd_span, cpu_map);
> > >
> > > *sd = (struct sched_domain){
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 14:05 [PATCH v6 0/2] sched: Enable preferred SMT siblings on NVIDIA Olympus Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Honor asymmetric SMT priority in idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-09-17 16:55 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-18 6:28 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-18 15:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Add asymmetric SMT packing override Andrea Righi
2026-09-18 14:14 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-18 16:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-18 18:27 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-09-18 18:24 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aq2CqGXjH_lrZVnS@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltrager@nvidia.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®