mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
Cc: Wandun Chen <chenwandun1@gmail.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	kernel@xen0n.name, alex@ghiti.fr, hpa@zytor.com,
	ruirui.yang@linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 10:11:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq41nFRPtRWTQ7cK@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqzxavL91icLw-Xv@fedora>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:08:10PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/02/26 at 03:31pm, Wandun Chen wrote:
> > From: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
> > 
> > Add MEMBLOCK_NODUMP to mark regions that should be excluded from
> > kdump vmcores.
> > 
> > The flag is meant for reserved memory that carries no data useful for
> > crash analysis. Reusable reserved regions such as CMA may hold useful
> > data, so these regions must not be marked MEMBLOCK_NODUMP. Subsequent
> > patches wire this up for /reserved-memory and /memreserve/ entries.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
> > Tested-by: Meijing Zhao <zhaomeijing@lixiang.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/memblock.h |  9 +++++++++
> >  mm/memblock.c            | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > index d62db9e776cf..b2fcf11fba2b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn;
> >   * kernel that we know is good to use. It is the only memory that
> >   * allocations may happen from in this phase.
> >   * @MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB: memory is reserved for hugetlb pages
> > + * @MEMBLOCK_NODUMP: exclude from kdump vmcore. It carries no data useful
> > + * for crash analysis (e.g. firmware carveouts).
> >   */
> >  enum memblock_flags {
> >  	MEMBLOCK_NONE		= 0x0,	/* No special request */
> > @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ enum memblock_flags {
> >  	MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN	= 0x20,	/* memory reserved for kernel use */
> >  	MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH	= 0x40,	/* scratch memory for kexec handover */
> >  	MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB	= 0x80, /* memory reserved for hugetlb pages */
> > +	MEMBLOCK_NODUMP		= 0x100,/* exclude from kdump vmcore */
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -160,6 +163,7 @@ int memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> >  int memblock_reserved_mark_kern(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> >  int memblock_mark_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> >  int memblock_clear_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> > +int memblock_mark_nodump(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> >  
> >  void memblock_free(void *ptr, size_t size);
> >  void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void);
> > @@ -306,6 +310,11 @@ static inline bool memblock_is_kho_scratch(struct memblock_region *m)
> >  	return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool memblock_is_nodump(struct memblock_region *m)
> > +{
> > +	return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_NODUMP;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long *start_pfn,
> >  			    unsigned long  *end_pfn);
> >  void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
> > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> > index f2952d725c10..2e87f39826dd 100644
> > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > @@ -1204,6 +1204,21 @@ __init int memblock_clear_kho_scratch(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> >  				    MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * memblock_mark_nodump - Mark a memory region with flag MEMBLOCK_NODUMP.
> > + * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> > + * @size: the size of the region
> > + *
> > + * Mark the region as not to be included in crash dumps.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > + */
> > +int __init_memblock memblock_mark_nodump(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> Is it impossible to use at runtime even thought it claims to be generic?

This should only happen at boot.

Allowing modifications of memblock properties in runtime is a can of worms
I don't want to open.
 
> > +{
> > +	return memblock_setclr_flag(&memblock.memory, base, size, 1,
> > +				    MEMBLOCK_NODUMP);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static bool should_skip_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> >  			       struct memblock_region *m,
> >  			       int nid, int flags)
> > @@ -2887,6 +2902,7 @@ static const char * const flagname[] = {
> >  	[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN)] = "RSV_KERN",
> >  	[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH)] = "KHO_SCRATCH",
> >  	[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB)] = "RSV_HUGETLB",
> > +	[ilog2(MEMBLOCK_NODUMP)] = "NODUMP",
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  7:31 [PATCH v6 00/10] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] mm: memblock: add missing HugeTLB flag name Wandun Chen
2026-09-14  5:20   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-09-15 12:49     ` Wandun
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree Wandun Chen
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default Wandun Chen
2026-09-18  7:30   ` Baoquan He
2026-09-18  8:45     ` Wandun
2026-09-18  8:48       ` Baoquan He
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug Wandun Chen
2026-09-18  7:54   ` Baoquan He
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region() Wandun Chen
2026-09-18  8:04   ` Baoquan He
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag Wandun Chen
2026-09-18  7:00   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-09-18  8:08   ` Baoquan He
2026-09-18  8:22     ` Wandun
2026-09-19  7:11     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-09-17 21:56   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-03  7:32   ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-09-17 21:56   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] of: reserved_mem: mark /memreserve/ entries as MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-09-03  7:32   ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-09-02  7:31 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF header Wandun Chen
2026-09-18  8:09   ` Baoquan He
2026-09-02  8:53 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Baoquan He
2026-09-03  7:05   ` Wandun
2026-09-03  7:31     ` Baoquan He
2026-09-03  7:43       ` Wandun
2026-09-03  9:38         ` Baoquan He
2026-09-04 11:08           ` Chen Wandun
2026-09-15 13:01 ` Wandun
2026-09-18  7:03   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-09-18  7:31     ` Baoquan He
2026-09-18  8:17 ` Baoquan He
2026-09-18 10:53   ` Wandun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aq41nFRPtRWTQ7cK@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®