Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Use "er" asm constriant for add/sub

["Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1230 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 08:21:27AM -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > While x86 usually goes through tip and none of the x86 maintainers
> > commented before Jonathan applied,
> 
> You mean it is easy to spot every question to x86 maintainers in the avalance
> of mails?

No, there was no hidden offence, I only meant what I wrote.

> > So I suggest to do the practical thing and pull Jonathan's branch into tip.
> > Technically that doesn't make a difference (apart from maybe branch vs tag
> > preferences).
> 
> It does make a difference when the merge window comes and we have to
> synchronize when to send what. And we send tip stuff very early.

I don't see what you mean. If both the tip tree and the iio tree
contain the same commit (with or without a tag on it), it doesn't matter
who created that and when and in which repo it appeared first. The first
to send it to Linus makes it new for him and all later PRs using it only
introduce the follow-up commits. So if you pull Jonathan's branch you
still can send the branch/tag that contains it whenever you like
independant of when Jonathan sends out his PR.

Best regards
Uwe

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]