mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: james.clark@linaro.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	leo.yan@linux.dev, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:01:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqF0zceTOQBjRJl1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9f1bafb17bc2e2c6152f6e3a0c63b9d72a0e657.1788872630.git.wutengda@huaweicloud.com>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 01:05:09PM +0000, Tengda Wu wrote:
> Assembly syntax for operands varies significantly across different
> architectures, which prevents the operand location (op_loc) parsing
> logic in annotate_get_insn_location() from being directly reused.
> 
> To simplify the core logic and improve maintainability, move the
> operand parsing inside the for_each_insn_op_loc loop into arch-specific
> extract_op_location callbacks. This refactoring is intended to be a
> cleanup with no functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>

Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung

> ---
>  .../util/annotate-arch/annotate-powerpc.c     |  9 ++
>  tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-x86.c  | 79 ++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c                    | 94 +------------------
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.h                    |  2 +
>  tools/perf/util/disasm.h                      |  4 +
>  5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-powerpc.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-powerpc.c
> index 218207b52581..00b93296fc94 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-powerpc.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-powerpc.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,14 @@ static void update_insn_state_powerpc(struct type_state *state,
>  }
>  #endif /* HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT */
>  
> +static void extract_op_location_powerpc(const struct arch *arch __maybe_unused,
> +					struct disasm_line *dl,
> +					const char *op_str __maybe_unused, int op_idx,
> +					struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc)
> +{
> +	get_powerpc_regs(dl->raw.raw_insn, !op_idx, op_loc);
> +}
> +
>  const struct arch *arch__new_powerpc(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id,
>  				     const char *cpuid __maybe_unused)
>  {
> @@ -406,5 +414,6 @@ const struct arch *arch__new_powerpc(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id,
>  #ifdef HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
>  	arch->update_insn_state = update_insn_state_powerpc;
>  #endif
> +	arch->extract_op_location = extract_op_location_powerpc;
>  	return arch;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-x86.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-x86.c
> index 7e6136536393..1acf31a2c759 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-x86.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-x86.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  #include <string.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
>  #include <linux/zalloc.h>
>  #include <assert.h>
>  #include <inttypes.h>
> @@ -809,6 +811,82 @@ static void update_insn_state_x86(struct type_state *state,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Get register number and access offset from the given instruction.
> + * It assumes AT&T x86 asm format like OFFSET(REG).
> + * Fills @reg and @offset when return 0.
> + */
> +static int extract_reg_offset(const struct arch *arch, const char *str,
> +			      struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc)
> +{
> +	char *p;
> +
> +	if (arch->objdump.register_char == 0)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It should start from offset, but it's possible to skip 0
> +	 * in the asm.  So 0(%rax) should be same as (%rax).
> +	 *
> +	 * However, it also start with a segment select register like
> +	 * %gs:0x18(%rbx).  In that case it should skip the part.
> +	 */
> +	if (*str == arch->objdump.register_char) {
> +		/* FIXME: Handle other segment registers */
> +		if (!strncmp(str, "%gs:", 4))
> +			op_loc->segment = INSN_SEG_X86_GS;
> +
> +		while (*str && !isdigit(*str) &&
> +		       *str != arch->objdump.memory_ref_char)
> +			str++;
> +	}
> +
> +	op_loc->offset = strtol(str, &p, 0);
> +	op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p);
> +	if (op_loc->reg1 == -1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* Get the second register */
> +	if (op_loc->multi_regs)
> +		op_loc->reg2 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p + 1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void extract_op_location_x86(const struct arch *arch,
> +				    struct disasm_line *dl __maybe_unused,
> +				    const char *op_str, int op_idx __maybe_unused,
> +				    struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc)
> +{
> +	if (op_str == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (strchr(op_str, arch->objdump.memory_ref_char)) {
> +		op_loc->mem_ref = true;
> +		extract_reg_offset(arch, op_str, op_loc);
> +	} else {
> +		const char *s = op_str;
> +		char *p = NULL;
> +
> +		/* FIXME: Handle other segment registers */
> +		if (!strncmp(op_str, "%gs:", 4)) {
> +			op_loc->segment = INSN_SEG_X86_GS;
> +			op_loc->offset = strtol(op_str + 4, &p, 0);
> +			if (p && p != op_str + 4)
> +				op_loc->imm = true;
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (*s == arch->objdump.register_char) {
> +			op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, s);
> +		} else if (*s == arch->objdump.imm_char) {
> +			op_loc->offset = strtol(s + 1, &p, 0);
> +			if (p && p != s + 1)
> +				op_loc->imm = true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  const struct arch *arch__new_x86(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id, const char *cpuid)
>  {
>  	struct arch *arch = zalloc(sizeof(*arch));
> @@ -848,5 +926,6 @@ const struct arch *arch__new_x86(const struct e_machine_and_e_flags *id, const c
>  #ifdef HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
>  	arch->update_insn_state = update_insn_state_x86;
>  #endif
> +	arch->extract_op_location = extract_op_location_x86;
>  	return arch;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index f3d17d153b67..a3d48cf88dad 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -2472,7 +2472,7 @@ int annotate_check_args(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
> +int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
>  {
>  	const char *p;
>  	char *regname, *q;
> @@ -2495,51 +2495,6 @@ static int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
>  	return reg < 0 ? -1 : reg;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Get register number and access offset from the given instruction.
> - * It assumes AT&T x86 asm format like OFFSET(REG).  Maybe it needs
> - * to revisit the format when it handles different architecture.
> - * Fills @reg and @offset when return 0.
> - */
> -static int extract_reg_offset(const struct arch *arch, const char *str,
> -			      struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc)
> -{
> -	char *p;
> -
> -	if (arch->objdump.register_char == 0)
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * It should start from offset, but it's possible to skip 0
> -	 * in the asm.  So 0(%rax) should be same as (%rax).
> -	 *
> -	 * However, it also start with a segment select register like
> -	 * %gs:0x18(%rbx).  In that case it should skip the part.
> -	 */
> -	if (*str == arch->objdump.register_char) {
> -		if (arch__is_x86(arch)) {
> -			/* FIXME: Handle other segment registers */
> -			if (!strncmp(str, "%gs:", 4))
> -				op_loc->segment = INSN_SEG_X86_GS;
> -		}
> -
> -		while (*str && !isdigit(*str) &&
> -		       *str != arch->objdump.memory_ref_char)
> -			str++;
> -	}
> -
> -	op_loc->offset = strtol(str, &p, 0);
> -	op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p);
> -	if (op_loc->reg1 == -1)
> -		return -1;
> -
> -	/* Get the second register */
> -	if (op_loc->multi_regs)
> -		op_loc->reg2 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, p + 1);
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * annotate_get_insn_location - Get location of instruction
>   * @arch: the architecture info
> @@ -2595,50 +2550,11 @@ int annotate_get_insn_location(const struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl,
>  		/* Invalidate the register by default */
>  		op_loc->reg1 = -1;
>  		op_loc->reg2 = -1;
> +		op_loc->mem_ref = mem_ref;
> +		op_loc->multi_regs = multi_regs;
>  
> -		if (insn_str == NULL) {
> -			if (!arch__is_powerpc(arch))
> -				continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * For powerpc, call get_powerpc_regs function which extracts the
> -		 * required fields for op_loc, ie reg1, reg2, offset from the
> -		 * raw instruction.
> -		 */
> -		if (arch__is_powerpc(arch)) {
> -			op_loc->mem_ref = mem_ref;
> -			op_loc->multi_regs = multi_regs;
> -			get_powerpc_regs(dl->raw.raw_insn, !i, op_loc);
> -		} else if (strchr(insn_str, arch->objdump.memory_ref_char)) {
> -			op_loc->mem_ref = true;
> -			op_loc->multi_regs = multi_regs;
> -			extract_reg_offset(arch, insn_str, op_loc);
> -		} else {
> -			const char *s = insn_str;
> -			char *p = NULL;
> -
> -			if (arch__is_x86(arch)) {
> -				/* FIXME: Handle other segment registers */
> -				if (!strncmp(insn_str, "%gs:", 4)) {
> -					op_loc->segment = INSN_SEG_X86_GS;
> -					op_loc->offset = strtol(insn_str + 4,
> -								&p, 0);
> -					if (p && p != insn_str + 4)
> -						op_loc->imm = true;
> -					continue;
> -				}
> -			}
> -
> -			if (*s == arch->objdump.register_char) {
> -				op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, s);
> -			}
> -			else if (*s == arch->objdump.imm_char) {
> -				op_loc->offset = strtol(s + 1, &p, 0);
> -				if (p && p != s + 1)
> -					op_loc->imm = true;
> -			}
> -		}
> +		if (arch->extract_op_location)
> +			arch->extract_op_location(arch, dl, insn_str, i, op_loc);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> index fa08d09b80f7..11b6e4780c02 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> @@ -492,6 +492,8 @@ int annotate_parse_percent_type(const struct option *opt, const char *_str,
>  
>  int annotate_check_args(void);
>  
> +int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str);
> +
>  /**
>   * struct annotated_op_loc - Location info of instruction operand
>   * @reg1: First register in the operand
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> index 06c664fd4fc2..62c2949c4c30 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct symbol;
>  struct data_loc_info;
>  struct type_state;
>  struct disasm_line;
> +struct annotated_op_loc;
>  
>  struct e_machine_and_e_flags {
>  	uint32_t e_flags;
> @@ -49,6 +50,9 @@ struct arch {
>  				struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die *cu_die,
>  				struct disasm_line *dl);
>  #endif
> +	void		(*extract_op_location)(const struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl,
> +					       const char *op_str, int op_idx,
> +					       struct annotated_op_loc *op_loc);
>  };
>  
>  struct ins {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 13:05 [PATCH v5 00/26] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 01/26] perf capstone: Symbolize address operands to match objdump on arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 02/26] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 14:50   ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 03/26] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 14:52   ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 04/26] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 14:58   ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 05/26] perf annotate: Normalize arch__dwarf_regnum() error return values Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 17:57   ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-09 15:00     ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 06/26] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 15:01   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 07/26] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 08/26] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 15:04   ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 09/26] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 10/26] perf annotate: Default to --itrace=i1i for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-09-09 15:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 11/26] perf arm-spe: Set default synthesized event period to 1 Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 12/26] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 13/26] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 14/26] perf annotate-data: Add arch_get_reg_offset helper Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 15/26] perf annotate-arm64: Track return type after call instructions Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 16/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-09-10 13:28   ` Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 17/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 18/26] perf annotate-data: Expand type_state_reg imm_value to u64 Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 19/26] perf annotate-data: Track imm_value for stack variables Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 20/26] perf annotate-x86: Delete stale stack state on store of untracked register Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 21/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 22/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:05 ` [PATCH v5 23/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:06 ` [PATCH v5 24/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:06 ` [PATCH v5 25/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:06 ` [PATCH v5 26/26] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-08 13:00 [PATCH v5 00/26] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-09-08 13:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/26] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqF0zceTOQBjRJl1@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®