From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: David Dai <zdai@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: jv@jvosburgh.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pradeeps@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: crypto offload enabled, non-offload slave failover, rekey failed
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:03:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqJkO4-49YtW4NxF@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apphLbjfmRYknVNh@fedora>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 02:11:57PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:01:23PM -0500, David Dai wrote:
> > Create a bonding device (i.e. bond0) in active-backup mode, 2 slaves.
> > Active slave: offload capable interface (i.e. eth1), primary interface.
> > Backup slave: non-offload capable interface(i.e. eth2).
> > Configure strongswan service swantl.conf child SA "hw_offload = crypto"
> > Start strongswan service
> > IPSec Crytpo Offload is enabled on top of bond0. i.e.
> > ip xfrm state |grep offload
> > crypto offload parameters: dev bond0 dir out mode crypto
> > crypto offload parameters: dev bond0 dir in mode crypto
> >
> > Active slave eth1 takes adavantage of IPSec Crypto Offload capability.
> >
> > If active slave eth1 is down for any reason (i.e. eth1 link down):
> > ip link set down dev eth1
> > non-offload capable interface eth2 failover to becomes active slave.
> > The existing SAs can continue use software IPsec after failover.
> > Traffic still keeps going properly.
> >
> > However if eth1 link had not recovered yet, strongswan service does
> > new child SA rekey, or uses swanctl command to do new child SA rekey,
> > it will fail because active slave eth2 doesn't support crypto offload.
> > In bond_ipsec_add_sa routine, it returns -EINVAL now, which is
> > treated as fatal error by xfrm_dev_state_add routine in kernel xfrm.
> >
> > To make the non-offload active slave survive the child SA rekey, need
> > to make bond_ipsec_add_sa routine returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead when
> > active slave doesn't support IPsec Crypto offload, the xfrm will
> > gracefully fallback to create new SA using Software IPsec.
> > Network traffic can keep going.
> >
> > After offload capable interface eth1 link is up, becomes active slave,
> > next time strongswan child SA rekey will create a new SA which enables
> > crypto offload again.
> >
> > This way, network traffic is never interrupted, always keeps going.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Dai <zdai@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: David Dai <zdai@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > index ef9eb0c53c66..79fc892dab07 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> > !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
> > netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Slave does not support ipsec offload");
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.55.0
> >
>
> The patch looks good to me. I am just not sure whether we should shorten
> the description. Let's wait for others' opinions.
>
BTW, please add
Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves")
if there is a next version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 22:01 David Dai
2026-09-04 6:11 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-09-10 8:03 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-09-10 14:23 ` David Dai
2026-09-10 1:02 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-10 22:30 ` David Dai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqJkO4-49YtW4NxF@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pradeeps@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zdai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®