From: Narcisa Vasile <narcisav.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Narcisa Vasile <narcisav.kernel@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel.zahka@gmail.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
willemb@google.com, petrm@nvidia.com, anubhavsinggh@google.com,
richardbgobert@gmail.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: add BIG TCP test cases
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:11:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqTfAVkzWa3P09iZ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911100101.2c34bdc5@kernel.org>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 10:01:01AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 22:06:59 -0700 Narcisa Vasile wrote:
> > Add four new test cases that validate coalescing
> > under increased size limits (BIG TCP):
>
> Looks like SW is struggling to aggregate enough. Do we need longer
> timeouts perhaps? Note that the debug kernel build includes
> kernel/configs/debug.config
>
> AI says:
>
> Thanks for adding the BIG TCP coalescing coverage to gro_sw.py. CI is
> flagging the new subtests as failing on our debug-kernel executor
> (vmksft-net-drv-dbg, gro-sw-py):
>
> not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_same
> not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml
> not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_tcp_seq
> not ok gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_large_max
> (and the ipv6 equivalents)
>
> The rx side never fully coalesces the injected segments before the
> background receiver gives up and the test's retry loop (6 attempts) is
> exhausted, e.g.:
>
> Expected {68952 }, Total 1 packets
> Received {20280 [!=68952]40560 [!=0]8112 [!=0]}, Total 3 packets.
I've run the tests in a loop on a slower system running a debug kernel using
10x the previous flush timeout and I still noticed retries every 10-20
iterations, so I've settled on 15x higher timeout to account for variability
across different systems.
1..4
ok 1 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_same
ok 2 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml
ok 3 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_tcp_seq
ok 4 gro_sw.test.ipv4_big_tcp_large_max
# Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
1..4
ok 1 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_data_same
ok 2 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_data_lrg_sml
ok 3 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_tcp_seq
ok 4 gro_sw.test.ipv6_big_tcp_large_max
# Totals: pass:4 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 5:06 Narcisa Vasile
2026-09-11 17:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-12 5:11 ` Narcisa Vasile [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqTfAVkzWa3P09iZ@gmail.com \
--to=narcisav.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anubhavsinggh@google.com \
--cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®