From: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
To: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:58:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqoh27cSs5gMHeAL@sm-arm-grace07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915154305.3852871-1-weilin.chang@arm.com>
Hi Wei-Lin,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is v6 of optimizing the shadow s2 mmu unmapping during MMU
> notifiers.
>
> This version fixes a few issues, and adds Marc's space optimization
> for kvm_guest_s2_mapping [1]. Please see the changelog for the details.
>
> Tested by booting L3, and running in-kernel targetted tests described
> in [2]. v5 got some tested-by's from Itaru and Wang (thanks), I didn't
> carry them over since some bugs fixed in v6 are non-obvious. Some
> retest would be much appreciated!
>
> Series based on v7.3-rc3 + Marc's nested mmu lifecycle fixes [3].
Observed on QEMU (accel tcg) only, but I saw:
[ 1812.052752] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1630
[ 1812.052896] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 596, name: shadow_stage2
The kernel is built on top of Marc's fix and your version six series, but
the fix for debugfs will be posted later?
Your hello_nested and shadow_stage2 ran without an issue.
Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
Itaru.
>
> * Changes from v5 [4]:
>
> - Align the addresses down to the mapping size when recording the
> guest s2 mappings. s2fd->fault_ipa isn't necessarily PAGE_SIZE aligned.
>
> - Record guest s2 mappings even when page table maps return -EAGAIN.
> kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() can create mappings while returning -EAGAIN.
> For example, a 2M block map (A) could race with a 4K page map (B):
> 1. (A) maps the 2M block in kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb()
> 2. (B) breaks that block into a table and maps 4K
> 3. (A) reloads and finds the table after kvm_pgtable_visitor_cb(),
> then descends into it.
> 4. (A) maps some 4K, but before it finishes reads entry mapped by (B).
> 5. (A) returns -EAGAIN although it had mapped a few pages.
> In this case, we don't know what subrange is mapped, just track the whole
> requested mapping range.
>
> - Don't remove tracked mappings from the interval trees if they only
> partially overlap the removal range. Because of the previous bullet point
> we can have a 4K shadow mapping tracked as a 2M range in the interval
> trees. It would be wrong to remove the 2M range when a guest TLBI doesn't
> touch the 4K mapped.
>
> - Check mmu->pgt during mmu unmap notifier, as it could race against
> MMU teardown.
>
> - Make guest_s2_tracking_destroy() canonical mmu only. We simply don't
> need to detach the nodes from the nested mmus' trees. Freeing them
> during canonical mmu's teardown is enough.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/86h5jv7qrd.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/gerjpm62a2gszzggc6vuai22bf3prfquvfsp7ueumps7vz2ev3@odlmovaklg2b/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20260911162203.1919330-1-maz@kernel.org/
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20260810205038.118843-1-weilin.chang@arm.com/
>
> Marc Zyngier (1):
> KVM: arm64: nv: Drop kvm_s2_mmu pointer from kvm_guest_s2_mapping
>
> Wei-Lin Chang (6):
> KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map()
> KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures
> KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation
> KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal
> KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap
> KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 31 +++++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h | 7 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 15:42 Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Drop kvm_s2_mmu pointer from kvm_guest_s2_mapping Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-15 23:22 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 23:27 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-16 7:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-15 22:49 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-16 4:58 ` Itaru Kitayama [this message]
2026-09-16 7:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-16 10:08 ` Wei-Lin Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqoh27cSs5gMHeAL@sm-arm-grace07 \
--to=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®