From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>,
Wang Han <wanghan@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 09:33:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3da18cc-78b2-45cf-9ea8-ce867c631834@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915154305.3852871-1-weilin.chang@arm.com>
On 9/15/26 11:42 PM, Wei-Lin Chang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is v6 of optimizing the shadow s2 mmu unmapping during MMU
> notifiers.
>
> This version fixes a few issues, and adds Marc's space optimization
> for kvm_guest_s2_mapping [1]. Please see the changelog for the details.
>
> Tested by booting L3, and running in-kernel targetted tests described
> in [2]. v5 got some tested-by's from Itaru and Wang (thanks), I didn't
> carry them over since some bugs fixed in v6 are non-obvious. Some
> retest would be much appreciated!
>
> Series based on v7.3-rc3 + Marc's nested mmu lifecycle fixes [3].
>
Hi Wei-Lin,
Thanks for the updated series.
I tested all seven patches on top of v7.3-rc3 with Marc's two
nested MMU lifetime fixes, using the L1 boot workload that previously
triggered soft lockups during host NUMA migration.
The setup was:
- ARM64 host with nested virtualization enabled
- Automatic NUMA balancing enabled, with numad running
- QEMU 10.2.3, virtualization=on
- Ubuntu 26.04 L1 guest, 8 vCPUs and 32 GiB RAM
Each trial used a fresh overlay backed by the same read-only golden
image. I ran 15 boot trials, observing each for at least 600 seconds.
Result Count
----------------------------- -----
Trials reaching guest login 15/15
Trials with guest soft lockups 0/15
Guest RCU stalls 0
Host hung-task reports 0
Host soft lockups 0
Tracing confirmed that host page migration and the reverse-map
recording path were exercised. I did not reproduce the original
soft lockup in this batch.
For the series:
Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Thanks,
Shuai
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 15:42 Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical IPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce guest stage-2 tracking structures Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping creation Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Track guest stage-2 mapping removal Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow stage-2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Drop kvm_s2_mmu pointer from kvm_guest_s2_mapping Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-15 23:22 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 23:27 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-16 7:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-17 6:51 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-17 7:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-17 21:46 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-17 13:10 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-15 22:49 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-16 4:58 ` Itaru Kitayama
2026-09-16 7:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-16 10:08 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-09-20 1:33 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3da18cc-78b2-45cf-9ea8-ce867c631834@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghan@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®