From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqrPobWbuOdsCnMc@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqrJAX6nMTIo6Vnn@thinkstation>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 05:27:42PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 11:15:15AM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > > My proposal makes the distinction between making the folio writable and
> > > making it dirty meaningful. ->page_mkwrite() allocates whatever is needed
> > > on the filesystem side to track dirty state and drive writeback for the
> > > *folio*, while ->dirty_folio_range() marks part of the folio dirty.
> >
> > Why do you think that's a meaningful distinction? We create a writable
> > PTE because we've taken a page fault for write. There's probably a few
> > naoseconds where the PTE is writable+clean before it becomes
> > writable+dirty, but even then sometimes we do both pte_mkwrite() and
> > pte_mkdirty() as an optimisation in the write fault path.
>
> This is true for the PTE that the fault was for. But we don't necessarily
> want to dirty the other 511 pages at the same time.
>
> The basic idea is to make the whole folio writable at fault and shift
> dirtying to be per-PTE on write to it.
Hmm. Is that something that filesystem people want? I suspect not.
I think they'd prefer to be told when we write-fault on each page.
But let's see if we can gather feedback from FS people.
> > It's very odd to be optimising for shared-writable-mmap. This is a
> > horrid model for I/O. https://cs.brown.edu/people/acrotty/pubs/p13-crotty.pdf
>
> Sure.
>
> But not everybody got the memo[1] :P
>
> I think it worth considering if we want to make large folio adoption
> smoother.
>
> [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/bcachefs/comments/1vepk4a/comment/p1sn4v1/
Since I'm an idiot, I'm not inclined to be helpful. But I think my
proposal does fix this; we call page_mkwrite() for each page fault and
then the filesystem knows which pages are actually dirty without having
to be told under the PTL when they can't reserve space.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 18:29 Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:12 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-10 13:36 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:51 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-10 14:54 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying " Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] xfs: track mmap dirty state per block Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Pedro Falcato
2026-09-03 21:18 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 10:15 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-16 16:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-09-16 17:09 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-16 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-09-09 10:02 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-09 10:15 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqrPobWbuOdsCnMc@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®