mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:19:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqrPobWbuOdsCnMc@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqrJAX6nMTIo6Vnn@thinkstation>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 06:09:17PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 05:27:42PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 11:15:15AM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > > My proposal makes the distinction between making the folio writable and
> > > making it dirty meaningful. ->page_mkwrite() allocates whatever is needed
> > > on the filesystem side to track dirty state and drive writeback for the
> > > *folio*, while ->dirty_folio_range() marks part of the folio dirty.
> > 
> > Why do you think that's a meaningful distinction?  We create a writable
> > PTE because we've taken a page fault for write.  There's probably a few
> > naoseconds where the PTE is writable+clean before it becomes
> > writable+dirty, but even then sometimes we do both pte_mkwrite() and
> > pte_mkdirty() as an optimisation in the write fault path.
> 
> This is true for the PTE that the fault was for. But we don't necessarily
> want to dirty the other 511 pages at the same time.
> 
> The basic idea is to make the whole folio writable at fault and shift
> dirtying to be per-PTE on write to it.

Hmm.  Is that something that filesystem people want?  I suspect not.
I think they'd prefer to be told when we write-fault on each page.
But let's see if we can gather feedback from FS people.

> > It's very odd to be optimising for shared-writable-mmap.  This is a
> > horrid model for I/O.  https://cs.brown.edu/people/acrotty/pubs/p13-crotty.pdf
> 
> Sure.
> 
> But not everybody got the memo[1] :P
> 
> I think it worth considering if we want to make large folio adoption
> smoother.
> 
> [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/bcachefs/comments/1vepk4a/comment/p1sn4v1/

Since I'm an idiot, I'm not inclined to be helpful.  But I think my
proposal does fix this; we call page_mkwrite() for each page fault and
then the filesystem knows which pages are actually dirty without having
to be told under the PTL when they can't reserve space.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 18:29 Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:12   ` Usama Arif
2026-09-10 13:36     ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:51   ` Usama Arif
2026-09-10 14:54     ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying " Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] xfs: track mmap dirty state per block Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Pedro Falcato
2026-09-03 21:18   ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 10:15 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-16 16:27   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-09-16 17:09     ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-16 17:19       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-09-09 10:02 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-09 10:15   ` Kiryl Shutsemau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqrPobWbuOdsCnMc@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®