mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared SIDs in insert/remove_master
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:17:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar6Vou12yzoZ2z8I@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-smmu-shared-sid-ver3-v4-2-06b34fb2e691@nxp.com>

On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 08:49:59PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> -static int arm_smmu_streams_cmp_node(struct rb_node *lhs,
> -				     const struct rb_node *rhs)
> +static int arm_smmu_streams_cmp_node(struct rb_node *lhs, const struct rb_node *rhs)

Why is this changed?

> @@ -4136,23 +4151,33 @@ static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  		existing = rb_find_add(&new_stream->node, &smmu->streams,
>  				       arm_smmu_streams_cmp_node);
>  		if (existing) {
> -			struct arm_smmu_master *existing_master =
> -				rb_entry(existing, struct arm_smmu_stream, node)
> -					->master;
> +			struct arm_smmu_stream *existing_stream =
> +				rb_entry(existing, struct arm_smmu_stream, node);
>  
>  			/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
> -			if (existing_master == master)
> +			if (existing_stream->master == master)
>  				continue;
>  
> -			dev_warn(master->dev,
> -				 "Aliasing StreamID 0x%x (from %s) unsupported, expect DMA to be broken\n",
> -				 sid, dev_name(existing_master->dev));
> -			ret = -ENODEV;
> -			break;
> +			if (master->num_streams != 1 ||
> +			    existing_stream->master->num_streams != 1) {
> +				dev_warn(master->dev,
> +					 "Shared StreamID 0x%x not supported for multi-SID masters\n",
> +					 sid);
> +				ret = -ENODEV;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (list_empty(&existing_stream->shared_masters))
> +				list_add_tail(&existing_stream->master->shared_masters_elm,
> +					      &existing_stream->shared_masters);
> +			list_add_tail(&master->shared_masters_elm,
> +				      &existing_stream->shared_masters);

Masters still hold duplicated streams for the shared SID. And their
ste_installed flags are out of sync..

    master_a->stream[0]->a's stream0 {ste_installed=true}
    master_b->stream[0]->b's stream0 {ste_installed=false}

What I have been suggesting is to have a shared stream:
    master_a->stream[0]-->shared stream0 {ste_installed=true}
    master_b->stream[0]-|

So, the driver would need a rework first changing master:
-       struct arm_smmu_stream          *streams;
+       struct arm_smmu_stream          **streams;

Also, arm_smmu_insert_master() needs to reverse its allocation:
	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
		stream = arm_smmu_find_stream(smmu, sid);
		if (stream) {
			// link to the existing stream
		} else {
			// allocate new stream
		}
		master->streams[i] = stream;
	}
	if (!ret)
		sort();

Nicolin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 12:49 [PATCH RFC v4 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared Stream IDs Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-01 12:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Skip duplicate SIDs when erasing streams from RB tree Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-01 16:07   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-02 10:19     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-01 12:49 ` [PATCH RFC v4 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support shared SIDs in insert/remove_master Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-01 17:17   ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-10-02 10:27     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-01 12:50 ` [PATCH RFC v4 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Group aliasing devices into the same IOMMU group Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-01 12:50 ` [PATCH RFC v4 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Wire up shared-SID STE ordering and feature gating Peng Fan (OSS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ar6Vou12yzoZ2z8I@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®