[PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Guangshuo Li]

amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
device.

Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
the associated platform object from being released.

Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
to properly unwind the successful device registration.

The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
confirmed by manual review.

Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
index e0ebcb0c4acd..449aad914ad1 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
@@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ static int __init amd_hfi_init(void)
 	}
 
 	ret = platform_driver_register(&amd_hfi_driver);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("failed to register HFI driver\n");
+		platform_device_unregister(device);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Mario Limonciello]

On 9/21/26 03:26, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
> device.
> 
> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
> the associated platform object from being released.
> 
> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
> 
> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
> confirmed by manual review.
> 
> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
> index e0ebcb0c4acd..449aad914ad1 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
> @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ static int __init amd_hfi_init(void)
>   	}
>   
>   	ret = platform_driver_register(&amd_hfi_driver);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
>   		pr_err("failed to register HFI driver\n");
> +		platform_device_unregister(device);
> +	}
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Mario Limonciello]

On 9/21/26 08:43, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/21/26 03:26, Guangshuo Li wrote:
>> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
>> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
>> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
>> device.
>>
>> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
>> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
>> the associated platform object from being released.
>>
>> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
>> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
>>
>> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
>> confirmed by manual review.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware 
>> Feedback Interface Driver")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c b/drivers/platform/ 
>> x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
>> index e0ebcb0c4acd..449aad914ad1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
>> @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ static int __init amd_hfi_init(void)
>>       }
>>       ret = platform_driver_register(&amd_hfi_driver);
>> -    if (ret)
>> +    if (ret) {
>>           pr_err("failed to register HFI driver\n");
>> +        platform_device_unregister(device);
>> +    }
>>       return ret;
>>   }

When I was reviewing some other bug reports I came to the realization 
this patch is unnecessary.  Instead we can just drop platform driver 
registration.

https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20260921170411.1149960-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com/

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[krzk]

On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:09 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
> device.
> 
> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
> the associated platform object from being released.
> 
> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
> 
> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
> confirmed by manual review.
> 
> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 


You sent multiple independent patches, to multiple independent
subsystems. The amount of these patches clearly suggest this was
AI generated and most likely not tested.

More importantly, you sent all this work without properly organizing
relevant patches into patchsets. This makes reviewing difficult
and might cause multiple reviewers to address the same issue.
Replying to the entire set is impossible and requires handling each
patch independently, instead of applying or discarding the set.
Maintainers also won't see the bigger picture of your work. Quite
worrying.

This is on the verge of hostile patch: bomb us with so many
contributions, we won't be able to handle them in efficient manner,
like responding ONCE to ask you to slow down.  Considering all this
is untested and LLM generated, I have even more doubts whether this
should be considered for review.

Please read kernel documentation BEFORE posting more work. It will
explain you how to identify subsystems, how to organize your work per
subsystem, how to document usage of LLM and how what you should not
do if this was posted in a good faith.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[krzk]

On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:09 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
> device.
> 
> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
> the associated platform object from being released.
> 
> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
> 
> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
> confirmed by manual review.
> 
> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 


You sent multiple independent patches, to multiple independent
subsystems. The amount of these patches clearly suggest this was
AI generated and most likely not tested.

More importantly, you sent all this work without properly organizing
relevant patches into patchsets. This makes reviewing difficult
and might cause multiple reviewers to address the same issue.
Replying to the entire set is impossible and requires handling each
patch independently, instead of applying or discarding the set.
Maintainers also won't see the bigger picture of your work. Quite
worrying.

This is on the verge of hostile patch: bomb us with so many
contributions, we won't be able to handle them in efficient manner,
like responding ONCE to ask you to slow down.  Considering all this
is untested and LLM generated, I have even more doubts whether this
should be considered for review.

Please read kernel documentation BEFORE posting more work. It will
explain you how to identify subsystems, how to organize your work per
subsystem, how to document usage of LLM and how what you should not
do if this was posted in a good faith.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[krzk]

On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:09 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
> device.
> 
> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
> the associated platform object from being released.
> 
> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
> 
> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
> confirmed by manual review.
> 
> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 


You sent multiple independent patches, to multiple independent
subsystems. The amount of these patches clearly suggest this was
AI generated and most likely not tested.

More importantly, you sent all this work without properly organizing
relevant patches into patchsets. This makes reviewing difficult
and might cause multiple reviewers to address the same issue.
Replying to the entire set is impossible and requires handling each
patch independently, instead of applying or discarding the set.
Maintainers also won't see the bigger picture of your work. Quite
worrying.

This is on the verge of hostile patch: bomb us with so many
contributions, we won't be able to handle them in efficient manner,
like responding ONCE to ask you to slow down.  Considering all this
is untested and LLM generated, I have even more doubts whether this
should be considered for review.

Please read kernel documentation BEFORE posting more work. It will
explain you how to identify subsystems, how to organize your work per
subsystem, how to document usage of LLM and how what you should not
do if this was posted in a good faith.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/09/2026 17:15, krzk@kernel.org wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:09 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
>> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
>> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
>> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
>> device.
>>
>> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
>> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
>> the associated platform object from being released.
>>
>> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
>> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
>>
>> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
>> confirmed by manual review.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> 
> You sent multiple independent patches, to multiple independent
> subsystems. The amount of these patches clearly suggest this was
> AI generated and most likely not tested.
> 
> More importantly, you sent all this work without properly organizing
> relevant patches into patchsets. This makes reviewing difficult
> and might cause multiple reviewers to address the same issue.
> Replying to the entire set is impossible and requires handling each
> patch independently, instead of applying or discarding the set.
> Maintainers also won't see the bigger picture of your work. Quite
> worrying.
> 
> This is on the verge of hostile patch: bomb us with so many
> contributions, we won't be able to handle them in efficient manner,
> like responding ONCE to ask you to slow down.  Considering all this
> is untested and LLM generated, I have even more doubts whether this
> should be considered for review.
> 
> Please read kernel documentation BEFORE posting more work. It will
> explain you how to identify subsystems, how to organize your work per
> subsystem, how to document usage of LLM and how what you should not
> do if this was posted in a good faith.


Apologies for spamming here, mistake on my side.

I guess the OpenClaw on the other side did not even notice...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Guangshuo Li]

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for your feedback.

On Tue, 22 Sept 2026 at 06:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 21/09/2026 17:15, krzk@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:09 +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> >> amd_hfi_init() registers the HFI platform device before registering
> >> the platform driver. If platform_driver_register() fails, the function
> >> returns the error without unregistering the already registered platform
> >> device.
> >>
> >> Since the failed init path does not run amd_hfi_exit(), the platform
> >> device remains registered and its reference is never dropped, preventing
> >> the associated platform object from being released.
> >>
> >> Unregister the platform device when platform driver registration fails
> >> to properly unwind the successful device registration.
> >>
> >> The issue was identified by a static analysis tool I developed and
> >> confirmed by manual review.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 5d902ee5609a ("platform/x86: hfi: Introduce AMD Hardware Feedback Interface Driver")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 4 +++-
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >
> >
> > You sent multiple independent patches, to multiple independent
> > subsystems. The amount of these patches clearly suggest this was
> > AI generated and most likely not tested.
> >
> > More importantly, you sent all this work without properly organizing
> > relevant patches into patchsets. This makes reviewing difficult
> > and might cause multiple reviewers to address the same issue.
> > Replying to the entire set is impossible and requires handling each
> > patch independently, instead of applying or discarding the set.
> > Maintainers also won't see the bigger picture of your work. Quite
> > worrying.
> >
> > This is on the verge of hostile patch: bomb us with so many
> > contributions, we won't be able to handle them in efficient manner,
> > like responding ONCE to ask you to slow down.  Considering all this
> > is untested and LLM generated, I have even more doubts whether this
> > should be considered for review.
> >
> > Please read kernel documentation BEFORE posting more work. It will
> > explain you how to identify subsystems, how to organize your work per
> > subsystem, how to document usage of LLM and how what you should not
> > do if this was posted in a good faith.
>
>
> Apologies for spamming here, mistake on my side.
>
> I guess the OpenClaw on the other side did not even notice...
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

I would like to clarify that these patches were manually reviewed and
audited by us; they were not simply generated and submitted by an LLM.
However, I understand why the recent submission pattern may have given
that impression. We sent too many patches in a short period of time,
and we also failed to respond to some discussions in a timely manner,
which made the situation look worse.

Many of the recent patches, especially the v2 revisions, are
corrections and improvements based on previous review feedback rather
than completely new untested changes. That said, we recognize that the
way we submitted them increased the burden on maintainers and
reviewers.

We apologize for the pressure this caused to the community. We will be
more careful about organizing patches by subsystem, preparing proper
patchsets, and following the kernel contribution guidelines before
sending future work.

Thank you again for pointing this out.

Best regards,
Guangshuo

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> We apologize for the pressure this caused to the community. We will be
> more careful about organizing patches by subsystem, preparing proper
> patchsets, and following the kernel contribution guidelines before
> sending future work.

If you're wondering how to really help the community, try to review and test
some patches you see on the ML. Whatever you choose - there's no shortage of
patches. You can even let your AI run on them and see what it catches.

This would be a lot more helpful than only dumping patches on people and
waiting for review.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86/amd/hfi: fix platform device leak on init failure

[Guangshuo Li]

Hi Borislav,

On Tue, 22 Sept 2026 at 11:06, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> > We apologize for the pressure this caused to the community. We will be
> > more careful about organizing patches by subsystem, preparing proper
> > patchsets, and following the kernel contribution guidelines before
> > sending future work.
>
> If you're wondering how to really help the community, try to review and test
> some patches you see on the ML. Whatever you choose - there's no shortage of
> patches. You can even let your AI run on them and see what it catches.
>
> This would be a lot more helpful than only dumping patches on people and
> waiting for review.
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Thanks for the suggestion.

Best regards,
Guangshuo