From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: tegra: Check for match_data being NULL
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:33:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arI8vXaKTvEJi-Zd@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arFYGka5NpcgJ8oQ@orome>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:24:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> You're probably not wrong about opt-in being the more natural choice,
> but looking at commit 3d713e0e382e ("driver core: platform: add device
> binding path 'driver_override'"), the intended use-cases are very
> generic, so it would probably lead to a continuous stream of patches
> needing to be added whenever a new device wants to be supported with
> vfio or something.
thinking a bit more about that: The use-case presented in that commit is
about
echo vfio-platform > /sys/bus/platform/devices/fff51000.ethernet/driver_override
. If we had an opt-in mechanism on the driver side, it would only be
vfio* that would need it, wouldn't it? That sounds handleable.
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 14:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: tegra: Cleanups and .get_state() Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-18 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm: tegra: Make use of dev_err_probe() Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-21 9:38 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-21 12:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-21 16:14 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-18 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: tegra: Check for match_data being NULL Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-21 9:47 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-21 14:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-21 16:24 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-21 20:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-22 8:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2026-09-22 10:06 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-18 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pwm: tegra: Implement .get_state() Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-21 10:18 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-21 14:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-09-22 10:07 ` Thierry Reding
2026-09-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: tegra: Cleanups and .get_state() Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arI8vXaKTvEJi-Zd@monoceros \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®