mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, gshan@redhat.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com,
	sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com,
	fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 4/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add support for SRO
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arozNIQ-fQ0XQViI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924135201.850038-5-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 02:51:58PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> +long rmi_sro_memxfer_execute(struct rmi_sro_state *sro, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *regs = &sro->regs;
> +	bool cancelled = false;
> +	unsigned long sro_handle;
> +
> +	rmi_smccc_invoke(regs);
> +
> +	sro_handle = regs->a1;
> +	while (RMI_RESULT_STATUS(regs->a0) == RMI_INCOMPLETE) {
> +		bool can_cancel = RMI_RESULT_CAN_CANCEL(regs->a0) == RMI_OP_CAN_CANCEL;
> +		int ret = 0;
> +
> +		switch (RMI_RESULT_MEMREQ(regs->a0)) {
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_NONE:
> +			rmi_op_continue(sro_handle, RMI_CONTINUE_KEEP_GOING,
> +					regs);
> +			break;
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_DONATE:
> +			ret = rmi_sro_donate(sro, sro_handle, regs->a2, regs,
> +					     gfp);
> +			break;
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_RECLAIM:
> +			ret = rmi_sro_reclaim(sro, sro_handle, regs);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +			ret = -ENXIO;
> +			break;
> +		}

Another thing I came across while looking whether we can defer the
activation. It seems that the spec (I_JVYCH) lists some SROs as
PE-bound. Nothing here or in rmi_sro_execute() disables migration and
the memory allocation paths can even sleep with GFP_KERNEL.

Do we need to disable preemption (only for rmi_sro_execute()) or at
least migration (the memxfer path)? We did something similar for the RSI
attestation token loop, commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use
migrate_disable() for attestation token requests").

With only migration disabled, another thread on the same CPU
issuing a PE-bound SRO would get RMI_BLOCKED (R_NDXSG). In theory, we
can get a priority inversion case (maybe this doesn't happen with the
current implementation, just looking at the API design). The RMI_BLOCKED
fix not to loop forever probably saves us but the caller would have to
actively sleep or give up before retrying (i.e. don't move the busy loop
higher app the call stack).

Another option is to have a per-CPU mutex here and serialise the SROs
which are PE-bound (there are some precedents for per-CPU mutexes in the
kernel).

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 13:51 [PATCH v19 0/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add RMM v2.0 base RMI support Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 13:51 ` [PATCH v19 1/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 16:57   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 22:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 17:05   ` Ackerley Tng
2026-09-24 22:49     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 13:51 ` [PATCH v19 2/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Check for RMI support at init Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 16:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-25  0:00   ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-25  8:51     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25  5:43   ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-25  8:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25 10:42   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-25 15:23     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-27  9:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-28  8:05         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 13:51 ` [PATCH v19 3/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 17:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
     [not found]     ` <d4b768e5-c942-43cf-aea2-c266a8bab353@oss.qualcomm.com>
2026-09-25 14:56       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-26 13:38         ` Venkata Rao Kakani
2026-09-25  0:03   ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-24 13:51 ` [PATCH v19 4/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add support for SRO Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 19:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 23:10     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25  5:24   ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-25 11:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-25 15:11     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28  9:28   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-09-28 10:13     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 17:28       ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-28 20:45         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 13:51 ` [PATCH v19 5/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Activate the RMM Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25 12:17   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-25 15:02     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25 15:34       ` Alper Gun
2026-09-25 16:42       ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-25 17:50         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28  9:08           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 13:55             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 18:01               ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-28 18:28                 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v19 6/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Ensure the RMM has GPT entries for memory Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 21:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 23:30     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25 15:30       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-25  0:07   ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v19 7/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add wrappers for Realm related RMI commands Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-25 11:56   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-09-25  6:29 ` [PATCH v19 0/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add RMM v2.0 base RMI support Gavin Shan
2026-09-25  9:03   ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arozNIQ-fQ0XQViI@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®