* [RFC net v4 1/4] bnxt_en: return the RING_FREE status to callers
2026-09-25 17:43 [RFC net v4 0/4] bnxt_en: Make RING FREE more robust Joe Damato
@ 2026-09-25 17:43 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:43 ` [RFC net v4 2/4] bnxt_en: check HWRM response if completion never arrives Joe Damato
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Damato @ 2026-09-25 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, Michael Chan, Pavan Chebbi, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Prashant Sreedharan
Cc: edumazet, horms, linux-kernel, Joe Damato
hwrm_ring_free_send_msg() reports failure to its caller, returning -EIO
when the firmware rejects HWRM_RING_FREE or never answers it. All three
ring free helpers that send the command discard the value.
Return it instead. No caller acts on it yet, so there is no functional
change.
Fixes: 74608fc98d28 ("bnxt_en: Ring free response from close path should use completion ring")
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 48 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index d7728d0c5b6e..a7f6facca7b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -7660,50 +7660,55 @@ static int hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(struct bnxt *bp,
return 0;
}
-static void bnxt_hwrm_tx_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
- struct bnxt_tx_ring_info *txr,
- bool close_path)
+static int bnxt_hwrm_tx_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
+ struct bnxt_tx_ring_info *txr,
+ bool close_path)
{
struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring = &txr->tx_ring_struct;
u32 cmpl_ring_id;
+ int rc;
if (ring->fw_ring_id == INVALID_HW_RING_ID)
- return;
+ return 0;
cmpl_ring_id = close_path ? bnxt_cp_ring_for_tx(bp, txr) :
INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
- hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring, RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_TX,
- cmpl_ring_id);
+ rc = hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring, RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_TX,
+ cmpl_ring_id);
ring->fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
+ return rc;
}
-static void bnxt_hwrm_rx_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
- struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
- bool close_path)
+static int bnxt_hwrm_rx_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
+ struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
+ bool close_path)
{
struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring = &rxr->rx_ring_struct;
u32 grp_idx = rxr->bnapi->index;
u32 cmpl_ring_id;
+ int rc;
if (ring->fw_ring_id == INVALID_HW_RING_ID)
- return;
+ return 0;
cmpl_ring_id = bnxt_cp_ring_for_rx(bp, rxr);
- hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring,
- RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_RX,
- close_path ? cmpl_ring_id :
- INVALID_HW_RING_ID);
+ rc = hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring,
+ RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_RX,
+ close_path ? cmpl_ring_id :
+ INVALID_HW_RING_ID);
ring->fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
bp->grp_info[grp_idx].rx_fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
+ return rc;
}
-static void bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
- struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
- bool close_path)
+static int bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
+ struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr,
+ bool close_path)
{
struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring = &rxr->rx_agg_ring_struct;
u32 grp_idx = rxr->bnapi->index;
u32 type, cmpl_ring_id;
+ int rc;
if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS)
type = RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_RX_AGG;
@@ -7711,14 +7716,15 @@ static void bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
type = RING_FREE_REQ_RING_TYPE_RX;
if (ring->fw_ring_id == INVALID_HW_RING_ID)
- return;
+ return 0;
cmpl_ring_id = bnxt_cp_ring_for_rx(bp, rxr);
- hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring, type,
- close_path ? cmpl_ring_id :
- INVALID_HW_RING_ID);
+ rc = hwrm_ring_free_send_msg(bp, ring, type,
+ close_path ? cmpl_ring_id :
+ INVALID_HW_RING_ID);
ring->fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
bp->grp_info[grp_idx].agg_fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
+ return rc;
}
static void bnxt_hwrm_cp_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp,
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC net v4 2/4] bnxt_en: check HWRM response if completion never arrives
2026-09-25 17:43 [RFC net v4 0/4] bnxt_en: Make RING FREE more robust Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:43 ` [RFC net v4 1/4] bnxt_en: return the RING_FREE status to callers Joe Damato
@ 2026-09-25 17:43 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:44 ` [RFC net v4 3/4] bnxt_en: stop DMA before releasing rings the firmware did not free Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:44 ` [RFC net v4 4/4] bnxt_en: refuse to open a device with stopped DMA Joe Damato
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Damato @ 2026-09-25 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, Michael Chan, Pavan Chebbi, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Prashant Sreedharan
Cc: edumazet, horms, linux-kernel, Joe Damato
When a command is sent over a completion ring, __hwrm_send() waits for
NAPI to consume the completion and gives up if it never arrives, without
looking at the response.
If a completion is not posted within the timeout, check the response
before giving up. If resp_len is set, the sequence id matches, and the
valid byte is set then the firmware completed the command and only the
notification was lost. Fall through to the normal error_code handling in
that case.
Several seconds are spent waiting for the completion, so a response that
was written at all is complete by the time the wait gives up. There is no
need to poll for the valid byte here the way the polling path below has
to, where the poll is for a non-zero length and the valid byte at the end
of the message may still be on its way.
Log the response state on both paths so there is more data when this rare
event occurs.
Fixes: 74608fc98d28 ("bnxt_en: Ring free response from close path should use completion ring")
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
---
.../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
index 5bfabdca7d0e..4feba90f0bf6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c
@@ -582,11 +582,36 @@ static int __hwrm_send(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_hwrm_ctx *ctx)
}
if (READ_ONCE(token->state) != BNXT_HWRM_COMPLETE) {
- hwrm_err(bp, ctx, "Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x%x\n",
- req_type);
- goto exit;
+ __le16 resp_seq_id;
+ u8 valid_byte = 0;
+
+ /* The completion ring entry was not delivered for
+ * some reason. It might be possible that the command
+ * was carried out even without a completion being
+ * posted. Check the response before giving up and log
+ * the state.
+ */
+ dma_rmb();
+ resp_seq_id = READ_ONCE(ctx->resp->seq_id);
+ len = le16_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(ctx->resp->resp_len));
+ if (len && resp_seq_id == ctx->req->seq_id)
+ valid_byte = *((u8 *)ctx->resp + len - 1);
+
+ if (!valid_byte) {
+ hwrm_err(bp, ctx,
+ "Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x%x len:%d seq:0x%x/0x%x\n",
+ req_type, len,
+ le16_to_cpu(resp_seq_id),
+ le16_to_cpu(ctx->req->seq_id));
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ netdev_warn(bp->dev,
+ "Resp cmpl intr not delivered, msg: 0x%x completed anyway (len:%d valid:0x%x err:0x%x)\n",
+ req_type, len, valid_byte,
+ le16_to_cpu(ctx->resp->error_code));
+ } else {
+ len = le16_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(ctx->resp->resp_len));
}
- len = le16_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(ctx->resp->resp_len));
valid = ((u8 *)ctx->resp) + len - 1;
} else {
__le16 seen_out_of_seq = ctx->req->seq_id; /* will never see */
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC net v4 3/4] bnxt_en: stop DMA before releasing rings the firmware did not free
2026-09-25 17:43 [RFC net v4 0/4] bnxt_en: Make RING FREE more robust Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:43 ` [RFC net v4 1/4] bnxt_en: return the RING_FREE status to callers Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:43 ` [RFC net v4 2/4] bnxt_en: check HWRM response if completion never arrives Joe Damato
@ 2026-09-25 17:44 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-25 17:44 ` [RFC net v4 4/4] bnxt_en: refuse to open a device with stopped DMA Joe Damato
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Damato @ 2026-09-25 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, Michael Chan, Pavan Chebbi, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Prashant Sreedharan
Cc: edumazet, horms, linux-kernel, Joe Damato
When HWRM_RING_FREE is not answered, bnxt_hwrm_ring_free() clears
fw_ring_id and __bnxt_close_nic() goes on to call bnxt_free_mem(), which
unmaps the ring memory and the RX buffers that the FW may still be
using.
This is reachable in production. On a BCM57504 the first sign is the TX
watchdog; the close that follows times out a subset of its RING_FREEs and
the driver releases those rings anyway:
05:30:12 NETDEV WATCHDOG: transmit queue 0 timed out 6073 ms
05:30:12 Resp cmpl intr err msg: 0x51 x20
05:30:12 hwrm_ring_free type 1 failed x12
05:30:12 hwrm_ring_free type 2 failed x8
05:30:12 AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT x3
Count the rings the firmware did not free and report that to the caller
so it can decide what to do. bnxt_hwrm_resource_free() still frees the
remaining firmware resources before returning the error, so the shutdown
can send every message it needs to before the device is stopped.
The device stays unusable until the driver is rebound.
Fixes: 74608fc98d28 ("bnxt_en: Ring free response from close path should use completion ring")
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index a7f6facca7b4..33e9ce8eb449 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -7754,21 +7754,25 @@ static void bnxt_clear_one_cp_ring(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cp
memset(cpr->cp_desc_ring[i], 0, size);
}
-static void bnxt_hwrm_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp, bool close_path)
+static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp, bool close_path)
{
+ int stuck = 0;
u32 type;
int i;
if (!bp->bnapi)
- return;
+ return 0;
for (i = 0; i < bp->tx_nr_rings; i++)
- bnxt_hwrm_tx_ring_free(bp, &bp->tx_ring[i], close_path);
+ if (bnxt_hwrm_tx_ring_free(bp, &bp->tx_ring[i], close_path))
+ stuck++;
bnxt_cancel_dim(bp);
for (i = 0; i < bp->rx_nr_rings; i++) {
- bnxt_hwrm_rx_ring_free(bp, &bp->rx_ring[i], close_path);
- bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_free(bp, &bp->rx_ring[i], close_path);
+ if (bnxt_hwrm_rx_ring_free(bp, &bp->rx_ring[i], close_path))
+ stuck++;
+ if (bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_free(bp, &bp->rx_ring[i], close_path))
+ stuck++;
}
/* The completion rings are about to be freed. After that the
@@ -7798,6 +7802,19 @@ static void bnxt_hwrm_ring_free(struct bnxt *bp, bool close_path)
bp->grp_info[i].cp_fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
}
}
+
+ if (!stuck)
+ return 0;
+
+ netdev_err(bp->dev, "Firmware did not free %d ring(s)\n", stuck);
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+static void bnxt_stop_dma(struct bnxt *bp)
+{
+ netdev_err(bp->dev,
+ "Disabling DMA before releasing ring memory, the driver must be rebound to recover\n");
+ pci_clear_master(bp->pdev);
}
static int __bnxt_trim_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int *rx, int *tx, int max,
@@ -10832,16 +10849,19 @@ static void bnxt_clear_vnic(struct bnxt *bp)
bnxt_hwrm_vnic_ctx_free(bp);
}
-static void bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(struct bnxt *bp, bool close_path,
- bool irq_re_init)
+static int bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(struct bnxt *bp, bool close_path,
+ bool irq_re_init)
{
+ int rc;
+
bnxt_clear_vnic(bp);
- bnxt_hwrm_ring_free(bp, close_path);
+ rc = bnxt_hwrm_ring_free(bp, close_path);
bnxt_hwrm_ring_grp_free(bp);
if (irq_re_init) {
bnxt_hwrm_stat_ctx_free(bp);
bnxt_hwrm_free_tunnel_ports(bp);
}
+ return rc;
}
static int bnxt_hwrm_set_br_mode(struct bnxt *bp, u16 br_mode)
@@ -11363,15 +11383,15 @@ static int bnxt_init_chip(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init)
return 0;
err_out:
- bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, 0, true);
+ if (bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, 0, true))
+ bnxt_stop_dma(bp);
return rc;
}
static int bnxt_shutdown_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init)
{
- bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, 1, irq_re_init);
- return 0;
+ return bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, 1, irq_re_init);
}
static int bnxt_init_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init)
@@ -13422,7 +13442,8 @@ int bnxt_half_open_nic(struct bnxt *bp)
*/
void bnxt_half_close_nic(struct bnxt *bp)
{
- bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, false, true);
+ if (bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, false, true))
+ bnxt_stop_dma(bp);
bnxt_del_napi(bp);
bnxt_free_skbs(bp);
bnxt_free_mem(bp, true);
@@ -13501,7 +13522,8 @@ static void __bnxt_close_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init,
if (BNXT_SUPPORTS_MULTI_RSS_CTX(bp))
bnxt_clear_rss_ctxs(bp);
/* Flush rings and disable interrupts */
- bnxt_shutdown_nic(bp, irq_re_init);
+ if (bnxt_shutdown_nic(bp, irq_re_init))
+ bnxt_stop_dma(bp);
/* TODO CHIMP_FW: Link/PHY related cleanup if (link_re_init) */
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [RFC net v4 4/4] bnxt_en: refuse to open a device with stopped DMA
2026-09-25 17:43 [RFC net v4 0/4] bnxt_en: Make RING FREE more robust Joe Damato
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-09-25 17:44 ` [RFC net v4 3/4] bnxt_en: stop DMA before releasing rings the firmware did not free Joe Damato
@ 2026-09-25 17:44 ` Joe Damato
2026-09-29 0:20 ` Joe Damato
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Damato @ 2026-09-25 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, Michael Chan, Pavan Chebbi, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Prashant Sreedharan
Cc: edumazet, horms, linux-kernel, Joe Damato
Add BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED and set it in bnxt_stop_dma() to signal that
the device had DMA disabled. When opening the device later, check this
bit and exit with an error.
This is a very rare case, but when it happens the device needs manual
intervention by the user to become usable again.
Fixes: 74608fc98d28 ("bnxt_en: Ring free response from close path should use completion ring")
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 33e9ce8eb449..21da989e136e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -7814,9 +7814,20 @@ static void bnxt_stop_dma(struct bnxt *bp)
{
netdev_err(bp->dev,
"Disabling DMA before releasing ring memory, the driver must be rebound to recover\n");
+ set_bit(BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED, &bp->state);
pci_clear_master(bp->pdev);
}
+static int bnxt_check_dma_stopped(struct bnxt *bp)
+{
+ if (!test_bit(BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED, &bp->state))
+ return 0;
+
+ netdev_err(bp->dev,
+ "DMA was disabled after the firmware failed to free rings, rebind the driver to recover\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
static int __bnxt_trim_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int *rx, int *tx, int max,
bool shared);
static int bnxt_trim_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int *rx, int *tx, int max,
@@ -13387,9 +13398,10 @@ static int __bnxt_open_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init, bool link_re_init)
int bnxt_open_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init, bool link_re_init)
{
- int rc = 0;
+ int rc;
- if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_ABORT_ERR, &bp->state))
+ rc = bnxt_check_dma_stopped(bp);
+ if (!rc && test_bit(BNXT_STATE_ABORT_ERR, &bp->state))
rc = -EIO;
if (!rc)
rc = __bnxt_open_nic(bp, irq_re_init, link_re_init);
@@ -13406,7 +13418,11 @@ int bnxt_open_nic(struct bnxt *bp, bool irq_re_init, bool link_re_init)
*/
int bnxt_half_open_nic(struct bnxt *bp)
{
- int rc = 0;
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = bnxt_check_dma_stopped(bp);
+ if (rc)
+ goto half_open_err;
if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_ABORT_ERR, &bp->state)) {
netdev_err(bp->dev, "A previous firmware reset has not completed, aborting half open\n");
@@ -13466,6 +13482,10 @@ static int bnxt_open(struct net_device *dev)
struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
int rc;
+ rc = bnxt_check_dma_stopped(bp);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_ABORT_ERR, &bp->state)) {
rc = bnxt_reinit_after_abort(bp);
if (rc) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
index c673b2ce4a0d..061f57824c7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
@@ -2470,6 +2470,7 @@ struct bnxt {
#define BNXT_STATE_DRV_REGISTERED 7
#define BNXT_STATE_PCI_CHANNEL_IO_FROZEN 8
#define BNXT_STATE_NAPI_DISABLED 9
+#define BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED 10
#define BNXT_STATE_FW_ACTIVATE 11
#define BNXT_STATE_RECOVER 12
#define BNXT_STATE_FW_NON_FATAL_COND 13
--
2.53.0-Meta
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC net v4 4/4] bnxt_en: refuse to open a device with stopped DMA
2026-09-25 17:44 ` [RFC net v4 4/4] bnxt_en: refuse to open a device with stopped DMA Joe Damato
@ 2026-09-29 0:20 ` Joe Damato
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Damato @ 2026-09-29 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, Michael Chan, Pavan Chebbi, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Prashant Sreedharan
Cc: edumazet, horms, linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 10:44:01AM -0700, Joe Damato wrote:
> Add BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED and set it in bnxt_stop_dma() to signal that
> the device had DMA disabled. When opening the device later, check this
> bit and exit with an error.
>
> This is a very rare case, but when it happens the device needs manual
> intervention by the user to become usable again.
>
> Fixes: 74608fc98d28 ("bnxt_en: Ring free response from close path should use completion ring")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> index c673b2ce4a0d..061f57824c7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
> @@ -2470,6 +2470,7 @@ struct bnxt {
> #define BNXT_STATE_DRV_REGISTERED 7
> #define BNXT_STATE_PCI_CHANNEL_IO_FROZEN 8
> #define BNXT_STATE_NAPI_DISABLED 9
> +#define BNXT_STATE_DMA_STOPPED 10
> #define BNXT_STATE_FW_ACTIVATE 11
FWIW: while applying this series to an older kernel to test it on some prod
hardware, I noted that this bit was previously taken.
If this is re-submit as a real series and not an RFC, I suppose I'll tweak
this to take a different bit to make backporting easier.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread