Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] serial: serialize asynchronous write wakeups with the port lock

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:45:54AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:33 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 04:11:08PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 2:44 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 02:25:46PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:

...

> > > > Some people might want to test the stuff. And sending too often you actually
> > > > will get the opposite results, people will be tired to even start reviewing
> > > > and/or testing your code as it's changed way too quickly.
> > >
> > > My thought process was that people wouldn't want to be testing code that
> > > had known bugs flagged in Sashiko reviews.
> >
> > Sashiko reviews are not visible in my or any other mailbox. To see them I have
> > to go to some URL and so on, meaning to waste time to see why on the earth the
> > new version has been sent.
> 
> Maybe the Sashiko reviews are getting caught in spam filtering or something?
> They are showing up for me and on the mailing list[0] so I'm a bit confused why
> you aren't seeing them. You shouldn't have to go to the web interface[1] to look
> up the reviews.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-183574@kernel.org/
> 
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/
> 
> > It's better before addressing Sashiko comments,
> > reply to all people involved and to Sashiko's original email, so it will be
> > visible in the previous version why you issued (actually about to issue) the
> > next version.
> 
> Hmm, maybe it makes sense to enable recipients in the reply_to config[2]?

It's up to the list owners / subsystem maintainers.

> [2] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/v.0.6.3/projects/linux/mailing_lists.toml#L290
> 
> > And before even issuing it, wait for a while, people might
> > disagree with Sashiko judgement or your replies on how to address that.
> 
> I was assuming everyone was seeing the Sashiko reviews getting posted to
> the mailing list already. The are ending up in lore so unless someone isn't
> subscribed to the list I'm not sure why they wouldn't be seeing those reviews
> already.

I assume you already answered your Q. mailing list in this sense doesn't mean
recipients. I think it simply goes to the mailing list without forwarding.

You can ask at helpdesk@ how this is configured on the kernel.org side.

> > TL;DR: this mailing list is *not* a playground with you and Sashiko, the whole
> > community is behind it.

> > > > Settle down first
> > > > with something, put on the cover letter the answer why not all Sashiko's
> > > > comments are being addressed (for example, due to amount of patches or the
> > > > series being focused on a certain issue).
> > >
> > > So, in general I've been always attempting to resolve known Sashiko issues
> > > in every subsequent re-spin, so that would be a bit tricky since I wouldn't be
> > > aware of the Sashiko issues until after the series has already been sent.
> > >
> > > Usually the subsequent issues that get flagged are new issues only discovered
> > > after each new re-spin.
> > >
> > > I do have a bunch of UART/DMA related patches that don't have flagged Sashiko
> > > issues so it probably makes sense to try and review those first while the larger
> > > series that have Sashiko flagged issues are still stabilizing.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > > > [0] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/389

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko