* linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the origin tree
@ 2026-10-26 11:27 Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2026-10-26 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1269 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in:
kernel/trace/trace_btf.h
between commit:
3f942403bbad3 ("Merge tag 'probes-v7.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace")
from the origin tree and commit:
13d8f2241106d ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'ftrace/ftrace/for-next' into trace/merge/for-next")
from the ftrace tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --combined kernel/trace/trace_btf.h
index b3d408e6a7f6c,54731bb4eab40..0000000000000
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_btf.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_btf.h
@@@ -19,7 -19,6 +19,7 @@@ const struct btf_member *btf_find_struc
const char *member_name,
u32 *anon_offset,
const struct btf_type **container_type);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
void btf_trim_retval(unsigned long func, unsigned long *retval, bool *print_retval,
int *fmt, bool hex);
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the origin tree
@ 2025-10-02 15:19 Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-10-02 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Masami Hiramatsu
Cc: Crystal Wood, Ivan Pravdin, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1406 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in:
tools/tracing/rtla/src/actions.c
between commit:
b1e0ff7209e95 ("rtla: Fix buffer overflow in actions_parse")
from the origin tree and commit:
05b7e10687c69 ("tools/rtla: Add remaining support for osnoise actions")
from the ftrace tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc tools/tracing/rtla/src/actions.c
index 13ff1934d47c9,991139f9069f1..0000000000000
--- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/actions.c
+++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/actions.c
@@@ -127,11 -127,11 +127,11 @@@ actions_add_continue(struct actions *se
* actions_parse - add an action based on text specification
*/
int
- actions_parse(struct actions *self, const char *trigger)
+ actions_parse(struct actions *self, const char *trigger, const char *tracefn)
{
enum action_type type = ACTION_NONE;
- char *token;
+ const char *token;
- char trigger_c[strlen(trigger)];
+ char trigger_c[strlen(trigger) + 1];
/* For ACTION_SIGNAL */
int signal = 0, pid = 0;
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-26 11:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-26 11:27 linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the origin tree Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-02 15:19 Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®