mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Tamaki Yanagawa <ty@000ty.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
	phil@nwl.cc, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: ipset: restore element before rescanning cidrs on seqcount retry
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 06:55:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atRROQfgdeGSIU5s@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261018035205.1008-1-ty@000ty.net>

Tamaki Yanagawa <ty@000ty.net> wrote:
> mtype_test_cidrs() masks the element under test in place with
> mtype_data_netmask() while walking the cidr array from the most to the
> least specific prefix. Since the walk is restarted on concurrent cidr
> array updates, the IPSET_NET_COUNT == 1 types (hash:net, hash:net,port,
> hash:ip,port,net, hash:net,iface) rescan with an element already masked
> to the widest prefix tried, so a lookup can wrongly match a more specific
> entry at the network base address (e.g. 10.200.3.4 matching 10.0.0.0/29).
> Restore the element before rescanning.

Is this a real world encountered bug or an LLM finding?

> +	/* mtype_data_netmask() masks @d in place, undo it before rescanning */
> +	*d = orig;
> +	goto retry;

Why do we need to do this instead of not masking @d in place to begin
with?

-mtype_test_cidrs(struct ip_set *set, struct mtype_elem *d,
+mtype_test_cidrs(struct ip_set *set, const struct mtype_elem *orig,

+       struct mtype_elem *data, d;
        struct hbucket *n;
-       struct mtype_elem *data;

 retry:
+       d = *orig;


... and fix up all reset calls:

 static void
 hash_netportnet6_data_reset_elem(struct hash_netportnet6_elem *elem,
-                                struct hash_netportnet6_elem *orig)
+                                const struct hash_netportnet6_elem *orig)

... much cleaner and less error prone, I think.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-18  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-18  3:52 Tamaki Yanagawa
2026-10-18  4:55 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-10-18  5:23   ` Tamaki Yanagawa
2026-10-18 11:44     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atRROQfgdeGSIU5s@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=ty@000ty.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®